Vector Calculus by Marsden and Tromba vs. Vector Analysis by Brand

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the rigor and proof-oriented nature of two vector calculus textbooks: "Vector Calculus" by Marsden and Tromba and "Vector Analysis" by Louis Brand. Participants express a preference for a more rigorous text than Marsden and Tromba, which is perceived as lacking in proof intensity. The suggestion of "Advanced Calculus" by Loomis and Sternberg is made as a potentially suitable alternative for those seeking a more rigorous approach to vector analysis.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic vector calculus concepts
  • Familiarity with proof techniques in mathematics
  • Knowledge of differential forms (optional but beneficial)
  • Experience with previous vector analysis texts, such as Susan Colley's "Vector Calculus"
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "Advanced Calculus" by Loomis and Sternberg for a rigorous approach
  • Explore "Vector Analysis" by Louis Brand for proof-intensive content
  • Investigate the differences between vector calculus and differential forms
  • Look into reviews and comparisons of Marsden and Tromba versus other vector calculus texts
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in mathematics, particularly those seeking rigorous resources for vector calculus and analysis, as well as anyone interested in deepening their understanding of proof techniques in mathematical texts.

MechanicalEngr
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Hi. I have heard that the marsden and Tromba book is not very rigorous. Is this true? I seek a vector book that is something proof intensive. I took vector analysis b4 with a book called vector calculus by Susan colley, I am looking for something more rigorous than this. Anyone read vector analysis by Louis brand? Seems hard to find a good vector book without doing into differential forms. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi all. I went ahead and ordered the analysis book by Brand, it was only 10 bucks. How about the Marsden and Tromba book? Is it rigourous and proof oriented? Thanks.
 
From what I was told, Marsden and Tromba is not considered to be rigorous and proof oriented. Why don't you check out Advanced Calculus by Loomis and Sternburg?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K