Vector Confusion In Applying Coulomb's Law

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around applying Coulomb's Law in a problem involving electric fields and vector components. Participants are trying to understand the constants associated with trigonometric functions in the context of resolving electric fields due to point charges.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants express confusion about the origin of constants in front of trigonometric functions, specifically in the context of distances and charge magnitudes. There are inquiries about the distances involved and whether the center point is equidistant from all charges. Some participants attempt to clarify the relationship between charge magnitudes and their respective distances.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights and clarifications regarding the electric field components. Some have identified where the constants originate, while others are still questioning the presence of sign errors in the trigonometric components. There is a recognition of the positive direction of certain vectors.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of a homework assignment, which may limit the information available for discussion. The problem involves resolving electric fields into unit vector components, and there is an ongoing examination of assumptions regarding distances and charge magnitudes.

PurelyPhysical
Messages
31
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


http://imgur.com/48cLE6q

Homework Equations


Coulomb's law

The Attempt at a Solution


I can follow most of this problem, but I am unsure where the constants in front of the trig functions are coming from. Why is it 2cos(135), 1cos(45), 2cos(-45), etc?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
PurelyPhysical said:
I can follow most of this problem, but I am unsure where the constants in front of the trig functions are coming from. Why is it 2cos(135), 1cos(45), 2cos(-45), etc?

pl. write down the electric field due to charges placed at those points on an unit positive charge placed at the coordinate under consideration, you will need the the distance square in the denominator and the field has been resolved in unit vector i and j directions...the factor 2 and i are coming due to those distances...
e.g. take the charge at a... it is distant sqrt(2)/2 ; take square then it will be 1/2 in the denominator so a factor of 2 in the numerator-resolve the field intensity in i and j direction along x and y respectively.

similarly check other ones.
 
drvrm said:
pl. write down the electric field due to charges placed at those points on an unit positive charge placed at the coordinate under consideration, you will need the the distance square in the denominator and the field has been resolved in unit vector i and j directions...the factor 2 and i are coming due to those distances...
e.g. take the charge at a... it is distant sqrt(2)/2 ; take square then it will be 1/2 in the denominator so a factor of 2 in the numerator-resolve the field intensity in i and j direction along x and y respectively.

similarly check other ones.

Why are there two distances 2 and 1? Isn't the center point equally distant from all the other points?

edit: I wrote down the electric field. I see now where the constants in front of the cos are coming from. But is there a sign error for the constants in front of sin?
 
Last edited:
check the full expression!
 
drvrm said:
check the full expression!

I see it now. What I didn't realize is that all of the y vectors are positive because the third vector points away from the positive charge. Thank you.
 
Last edited:
PurelyPhysical said:
Why are there two distances 2 and 1?
There are not two distances. Factors 1 and 2 are the charges. The factors for the displacements are 2 (1/r2), the unit vectors ##\hat i## and ##\hat j## and the trig components, sin and cos..
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
9K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K