Vector Potential of Spinning Sphere

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the vector potential of a spinning sphere, specifically referencing a problem from Griffiths' text. The original poster explores different configurations for calculating the current density associated with the spinning sphere.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to solve for the current density using two different orientations of the spinning sphere, questioning the validity of the second approach that yields a zero result. Other participants suggest alternative methods for calculating the cross product and discuss the implications of integration leading to zero.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, exploring various mathematical techniques and questioning the assumptions made in the original poster's approach. Some guidance has been offered regarding the use of linear algebra and spherical harmonics, with indications that these methods may lead to a more fruitful resolution.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of the original poster's concern about the integration process leading to a zero result, which raises questions about the setup and assumptions of the problem. The discussion reflects differing opinions on the appropriateness of certain mathematical techniques for this context.

Shinobii
Messages
33
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I am just wondering, in Griffiths text, he solves this problem for a spinning shell. He states that the problem is easier if you tilt the sphere so it is spinning in the xz plane.

Homework Equations



When solving for the current density, Griffiths writes,

$$
(\omega \times r') =
\begin{vmatrix}
\hat{x} & \hat{y} & \hat{z} \\
\omega \sin(\psi') & 0 & \omega \cos(\psi') \\
r' \sin(\theta') \cos(\phi') & r' \sin(\theta') \sin(\phi') & r' \cos(\theta')
\end{vmatrix}
$$

The Attempt at a Solution



But suppose we want to try it on the z-axis such that,

$$
(\omega \times r') =
\begin{vmatrix}
\hat{x} & \hat{y} & \hat{z} \\
0 & 0 & \omega \\
r' \sin(\theta') \cos(\phi') & r' \sin(\theta') \sin(\phi') & r' \cos(\theta')
\end{vmatrix}
$$

Doing this however yields an answer of 0! Since,

$$
\int_0^{2 \pi} sin(\phi') d\phi' = \int_0^{2 \pi} cos(\phi') d\phi' = 0
$$

Does anyone have insight to if this problem is solvable using the second method? I ask this, because this is what I would do in an exam situation!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First, you might consider losing the determinant calculation. If you are at this level of mathematics, you might as well use linear algebra rather than a mnemonic, if not using the tensor definition of the cross product.

Define the cross product of two vectors, ##\vec{a}## and ##\vec{b}##, as ##\vec{a}\times\vec{b}=\left[\begin{matrix} 0 & -a_3 & a_2 \\ a_3 & 0 & -a_1 \\ -a_2 & a_1 & 0 \end{matrix}\right]\left[\begin{matrix} b_1 \\ b_2 \\ b_3 \end{matrix}\right]##, where ##a_i## is the ith component of the ##\mathbb{R}^3## vector ##\vec{a}##, with ##b_i## defined similarly.

Assuming that ##\omega## and r' are not scalar multiples of each other, the cross product should not reduce to the zero (probably not 0!=1 either) vector.
 
Hmm, mathematics aside (I completely disagree with you, the mnemonic is simple to understand physically, while tensor notation is required for more difficult problems (such as relativistic electrodynamics), this problem is rather simple) you will still get zero. I am not worried about my terms cancelling out, it is the integration that sets my answer to zero. . .
 
Ah, I see now that I can exploit spherical harmonics and symmetry which leaves me with the correct result! Since,

$$
\sin(\theta')\cos(\phi') = - \sqrt{\frac{8 \pi}{3}}{\rm{Re}}[Y_{1,1}(\theta', \phi')]
$$

Then by orthogonality everything should fall into place (I have not done this but I will do so right away and verify that it works).

Yep, this method works fine and dandy! Thanks again Mandelbroth, I appreciate you taking the time to reply.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K