Vector Spaces: Cartesian vs Tensor products

Click For Summary
The discussion clarifies the differences between the Cartesian product and tensor product of vector spaces. The Cartesian product, denoted as V1 x V2, has a dimension equal to the sum of the dimensions of the individual spaces, resulting in n + m dimensions. In contrast, the tensor product, denoted as V1 xc V2, has a dimension equal to the product of the dimensions, yielding mn dimensions. The Cartesian product can be viewed as a direct sum, while the tensor product adheres to the distributive law. Overall, the key distinction lies in the additive nature of the Cartesian product versus the multiplicative nature of the tensor product.
Monte_Carlo
Messages
70
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I have a problem understanding the difference between Cartesian product of vector spaces and tensor product. Let V1 and V2 be vector spaces. V1 x V2 is Cartesian product and V1 xc V2 is tensor product (xc for x circled). How many dimensions are in V1 x V2 vs V1 xc V2?

Thanks,

Monte
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It really depends how you define addition on cartesian products. The usual definition is

(v_1+v_2,w_1+w_2)=(v_1,w_1)+(v_2,w_2)

In this case, the cartesian product is usually called a direct sum, written as V \oplus W.
If you think about it, this 'product' is more like a sum--for instance, if v_1,v_2,...v_n are a basis for V and w_1,w_2,...w_m are a basis for W, then a basis for V \oplus W is given by
v_1 \oplus 0, ..., v_n \oplus 0, 0 \oplus w_1, ..., 0 \oplus w_m, and so the dimension is n+m

A tensor product, on the other hand, is actually a product (which can be thought of as a concatenation of two vectors) that obeys the distributive law:

(v_1+v_2)\otimes (w_1+w_2)=v_1 \otimes w_1 + v_1 \otimes w_2 + v_2 \otimes w_1 + v_2 \otimes w_2

One basis is
v_1 \otimes w_1, v_1 \otimes w_2, ..., v_2 \otimes w_1, ..., ..., v_n \otimes w_m
and the space has dimension mn (as expected of a product).
 
I'm having a hard time following because my computer doesn't show the symbols in a standard mathematical notation. Would you be able to refer to some online source with the same information?
 
if a,b,c and x,y are bases of V, W then (a,0),(b,0),(c,0),(0,x),(0,y) is a basis of the cartesian product VxW, while (a,x), (b,x),(c,x),(a,y),(b,y),(c,y) is a basis of the tensor product VtensW.

so dimension is additive for cartesian product and multiplicative for tensor product.
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K