Vector Spaces over Real and Complex Numbers: A Comparison

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter JG89
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Vector Vector spaces
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion focuses on the properties of vector spaces, specifically comparing the vector space of continuous complex functions C(a,b) over the fields of real and complex numbers. Participants explore the implications of dimension and basis representation in these spaces, addressing both theoretical and conceptual aspects.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that C(a,b) can be considered a vector space over the real numbers, as complex-valued functions can be multiplied by real numbers.
  • Others discuss the relationship between the dimensions of vector spaces over different fields, suggesting that the dimension of a complex space is twice that of its corresponding real space.
  • A participant raises a concern about the treatment of infinite cardinals in the context of dimensions, indicating that there are distinct notions that should not be overlooked.
  • Some participants question how to explicitly identify the additional basis vectors when transitioning from a complex basis to a real basis.
  • There is a suggestion that a complex vector space can be viewed as a subspace of a real vector space, although this is contested regarding the definition of subspaces.
  • A later reply clarifies that if a complex basis is given, the corresponding real basis can be constructed by including additional vectors derived from the complex basis.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying views on the relationship between dimensions of vector spaces over different fields, and there is no consensus on how to explicitly define the additional basis vectors when transitioning from complex to real spaces. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the precise formulation of these concepts.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the definitions and properties of vector spaces depend on the fields over which they are defined, and there are unresolved mathematical steps regarding the identification of basis vectors.

JG89
Messages
724
Reaction score
1
Would the space C(a,b) (where any element of the space is a continuous complex function) also be a space over the field R of real numbers since the field C has a subfield that is isomorphic to R?EDIT: I am thinking yes because all of the axioms that have to be satisfied in order for a set to be a vector space is satisfied if you have C(a,b) being a space over R.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, you certainly can multiply complex valued functions by real numbers and so you can define C(a,b) as a vector space over the real numbers.
 
good observation. now can you see how the dimension over R relates to the dimension over C?
 
mathwonk said:
good observation. now can you see how the dimension over R relates to the dimension over C?

They're the same, roy: twice any infinite cardinal is still the same infinite cardinal. If I did smilies I'd put one into show I was pulling your leg a little. But I don't do them.
 
Looks like the question has already been answered. I was going to say that since a real space is infinite-dimensional, and that a complex space contains a real space, then the dimension of a complex space must also be infinite.EDIT: More specifically, since you can find an infinite amount of linearly independent vectors in a real space, then any amount of linearly independent vectors found in a complex space will be added to the amount of linearly independent vectors in the real space, which is infinite. So infinite plus anything is also infinite.
 
There are distinct notions of infinite cardinals, so you shouldn't be so blase.
 
I've been learning Linear Algebra for about a week now...I just answered the question with what I knew
 
good points all. now let me try to continue to make what is an interesting point for a learner. if V is a complex vector space with basis{xj}, what is a real basis for V?
 
mathwonk said:
good points all. now let me try to continue to make what is an interesting point for a learner. if V is a complex vector space with basis{xj}, what is a real basis for V?


I am assuming by you asking "what is a real basis for v", you are asking what is a basis for V regarded as a real space. So, the dimension of a vector space is equal to the amount of basis vectors in that space. So, in a complex vector space with basis {xj} where I am assuming J is the amount of basis vectors, then J is also the dimension of the complex vector space, V. Now, the dimension of a real space is twice that of a complex space. So the dimension of the complex space regarded as a real space is 2j, so the basis vector would be {x2j}.
 
  • #10
that does not answer the question. you have not said what ARE the extra vectors xJ+1,...,x2J.

you are only saying how MANY vectors are in the new basis. to prove you are right you need to produce those vectors from the old ones explicitly.
 
  • #11
mathwonk said:
that does not answer the question. you have not said what ARE the extra vectors xJ+1,...,x2J.

you are only saying how MANY vectors are in the new basis. to prove you are right you need to produce those vectors from the old ones explicitly.


Just thinking out loud here...

A complex space should be a subspace of a real space, so since the vectors for the complex basis is x1, x2,...,xj, then there are certain vectors, belonging only to the real space, that when combined with the complex basis form a new basis: x1,x2,...,xj, xj+1,...,x2j

So now I have to explain what the new vectors, xj+1,...,x2j are. Doesn't that depend on what an element of that certain space is? For example, in a space Kn, an element of that space is any ordered n-tuple, whereas an element of the space R(a,b) is any continuous real function.

If the element of the spaces you are asking about is any ordered n-tuple, then any element x of the real space can be represented by:

x = c1(1,0,...,0) + c2(0,1,...0) +...+ cj (0,0,...,1) + cj+1(i,0,...,0) + ... + c2j(0,0,...i)

where the numbers c1,c2,...,c2j are components of the vector x with respect to the basis.

The basis for the complex space was x1,x2,...,xj. So, the basis for the real space would be x1,x2,...,xj, i(x1), i(x2),...,i(xj), where i(x1) = xj+1, i(x2) = xj+2 and so on
 
  • #12
JG89 said:
Just thinking out loud here...

A complex space should be a subspace of a real space

That just isn't the way to say it: a subspace of a vector space V is by definition taken to be over the same field as V.
 
  • #13
n_bourbaki said:
That just isn't the way to say it: a subspace of a vector space V is by definition taken to be over the same field as V.
Thanks for the correction. How would I say what I was trying to say?
 
Last edited:
  • #14
well i agree with your answer: namely if x1,x2,.. is the complex basis then x1,ix1,x2,ix2,... is a real basis.

and that's how you prove the real dimension is twice the complex dimension.
 
  • #15
Thanks for taking the time to help me learn.
 
  • #16
thanks for the appreciation. my pleasure.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
9K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
10K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K