Vector Subspaces: Understanding Closure Properties

  • Thread starter Thread starter nayfie
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Subspaces Vector
nayfie
Messages
50
Reaction score
0
Hello :)

I've been doing a lot of work on subspaces but have come across this question and need a bit of help!

Homework Statement



[itex]W = {(x, y) \in R^{2} | x^{2} + y^{2} = 0}[/itex]

Homework Equations



1. 0 ∈ W
2. ∀ u,v ∈ W; u+v ∈ W
3. ∀ c ∈ R and u ∈ W; cu ∈ W

The Attempt at a Solution



Check for 0 vector

[itex]x^{2} + y^{2} = 0[/itex]

[itex]0^{2} + 0^{2} = 0[/itex]

[itex]0 = 0[/itex]

Check closure under scalar addition

Let [itex]u = x^{2} + y^{2} = 0[/itex]; let [itex]v = a^{2} + b^{2} = 0[/itex]

[itex]u + v = (x^{2} + a^{2}) + (y^{2} + b^{2}) = 0 + 0 = 0[/itex]

Check for closure under scalar multiplication

[itex]ku = (kx)^{2} + (ky)^{2} = 0[/itex]

[itex]= k^{2}(x^{2} + y^{2}) = 0[/itex]

[itex]x^{2} + y^{2} = \frac{0}{k^{2}}[/itex]

[itex]x^{2} + y^{2} = 0[/itex]

-----------------------------------

I have shown that the zero vector is in the set, and that it is closed under scalar multiplication, however; I'm not sure whether or not it is closed under scalar multiplication.

I have shown that u + v = 0, but, u + v does not have the same form as u and v individually, so I don't think u + v is part of the set?
 
Last edited:
on Phys.org
Just took another look at this question and might have solved it.

[itex]u = (a, b), v = (c, d), u + v = (a + c, b + d)[/itex]

[itex](a + c)^{2} + (b + d)^{2} = 0[/itex]

[itex]a^{2} + 2ac + c^{2} + b^{2} + 2bd + d^{2} = 0[/itex]

But, we know from the constraints of the subspace that;

[itex]a^{2} + b^{2} = 0; c^{2} + b^{2} = 0[/itex]

So if we cancel those out, we get;

[itex]2ac + 2bd = 0[/itex]

So in general, scalar addition breaks the constraint.

Does this even make sense or do I need more sleep?
 
Yes, you need more sleep.

Think about what your set looks like - W = {(x, y) [itex]\in[/itex] R2| x2 + y2 = 0}.

This set consists of a single point at (0, 0). If u [itex]\in[/itex] W and v [itex]\in[/itex] W, what must u and v be? It should be easy to show that u + v [itex]\in[/itex] W.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K