Vector Transformation in \mathbb{R}^n and \mathbb{R}^m with Separable Components

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on demonstrating that a transformation \mathcal{A} from \mathbb{R}^n to \mathbb{R}^m can be expressed as a composition of three mappings: a projection p, an invertible transformation \mathcal{B}, and an inclusion i. The projection p maps vectors onto the orthogonal complement of the kernel of \mathcal{A}, while \mathcal{B} transforms this complement into the image of \mathcal{A}. The inclusion i serves to incorporate the image back into \mathbb{R}^n. The conversation emphasizes understanding the kernel and its complement, as well as the relationships between these transformations. Overall, the thread seeks clarity on how to construct this separation effectively.
nille40
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
Hi! I'm in serious need of some help.

I am supposed to show that a transformation \mathcal{A} = \mathbb{R}^n \rightarrow \mathbb{R}^m can be separated into \mathcal{A} = i \circ \mathcal{B} \circ p where

  • p is the projection on the (orthogonal) complement of the kernel of \mathcal{A}.

    \mathcal{B} is an invertible transformation from the complement to the kernel to the image of \mathcal{A}.

    i is the inclusion of the image in \mathbb{R}^n

I hardly know where to start! I would really like some help. I asked this question before, in a different topic, but got a response I didn't understand. I posted a follow-up, but got no response on that.

Thanks in advance,
Nille
 
Physics news on Phys.org
let K be the kernel of B. Then A is K direct sum K*, where we'll use * to denote the complementary vector space.

Let p be the map p(k) = 0 if k in K, and p(x)=x for x in K*, extended linearly. This means that any vector in A can be written as x+k for x in K* and k in K, and then

p(x+k)=x.


This is your projection.

Notice that for all v in A that Bp(v)=v.

The inclusion is the dual construction:

Let I be the image of B. This is a subspace of of R^n. Pick a complementary subspace I*

Then there is a natural map from I to Idirect sum I*, just the inclusion of the vector, call tis map i.

Obviously the map iBp is the same as B.


This is just the Isomorphism theorems glued together.
 



Hi Nille,

I'd be happy to help you with this problem. Let's break it down step by step.

First, let's define our transformation \mathcal{A}: \mathbb{R}^n \rightarrow \mathbb{R}^m. This means that \mathcal{A} takes in a vector in \mathbb{R}^n and outputs a vector in \mathbb{R}^m. So we can represent \mathcal{A} as a matrix A with m rows and n columns.

Next, let's define the kernel of \mathcal{A}. The kernel of a transformation is the set of all vectors that get mapped to the zero vector in the output space. In other words, it's the set of all x \in \mathbb{R}^n such that \mathcal{A}(x) = 0.

Now, let's define the complement of the kernel. This is the set of all vectors in \mathbb{R}^n that are not in the kernel of \mathcal{A}. In other words, it's the set of all x \in \mathbb{R}^n such that \mathcal{A}(x) \neq 0.

The projection on the complement of the kernel of \mathcal{A} is a transformation p that takes in a vector x \in \mathbb{R}^n and outputs a vector p(x) \in \mathbb{R}^n, where p(x) is the projection of x onto the complement of the kernel of \mathcal{A}. This means that p(x) is the closest vector to x that is not in the kernel of \mathcal{A}. We can represent this as a matrix P with n rows and n columns.

Now, let's define \mathcal{B}. This is a transformation from the complement of the kernel of \mathcal{A} to the image of \mathcal{A}. This means that \mathcal{B} takes in a vector x \in \mathbb{R}^n and outputs a vector \mathcal{B}(x) \in \mathbb{R}^m, where \mathcal{B}(x) is the transformation of x by \mathcal{A}. We can represent this as a matrix B with m rows and n columns.

 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
2K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
853
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K