Vectors as a differential op and covectors as differenential

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter binbagsss
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Differential Vectors
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the definitions and properties of vectors and covectors in the context of differential geometry, specifically within the framework of manifolds. The tangent vector at a point \( p \) is defined as an equivalence class of curves through \( p \), independent of the chosen coordinate system. The relationship between differential forms and tangent vectors is established through the definition of the differential \( \mathrm{d}f \) and its action on vectors, leading to the conclusion that the dual space of tangent vectors corresponds to covectors. This understanding is crucial for advanced studies in differential geometry and manifold theory.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of differential geometry concepts, particularly manifolds and tangent spaces.
  • Familiarity with the definitions of vectors and covectors in the context of smooth manifolds.
  • Knowledge of differential forms and their properties, including the operation of the differential \( \mathrm{d} \).
  • Basic calculus, including limits and directional derivatives in Euclidean space.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of equivalence classes of curves in differential geometry.
  • Learn about the properties and applications of differential forms in manifold theory.
  • Explore the relationship between tangent spaces and cotangent spaces in more depth.
  • Investigate the Jacobian matrix and its role in defining linear maps between vector spaces.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and students of differential geometry who seek to deepen their understanding of the interplay between vectors and covectors in manifold theory.

binbagsss
Messages
1,291
Reaction score
12
Hey,

I'm new to this , and I understand the derivation of the transition laws for overlapping regions of a manifold for covectors and vectors starting from thinking of them as a differential and a differential operator respectively, but I don't really have a clue where this comes from...

Any assistance or a point toward some good source, greatly appreciated !
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There's a more intuitive definition of the tangent space at p that isn't used much, because it's harder to work with. By this definition, a tangent vector at p is an equivalence class of curves through p. The equivalence relation is defined using a coordinate system ##x:U\to\mathbb R^n## such that ##p\in U##. We say that two curves ##C:\mathbb R\to M## and ##B:\mathbb R\to M## such that ##C(0)=B(0)=p## are equivalent if
$$(x\circ C)'(0)=(x\circ B)'(0).$$ It turns out that this definition is independent of the chosen coordinate system. We can then define addition and scalar multiplication on the set of equivalence classes to turn it into a vector space. And then we can prove that the tangent space defined this way is isomorphic to the already familiar tangent space at p. The isomorphism is the map ##\phi## defined by
$$\phi([C])(f)=(f\circ C)'(0)$$ for all equivalence classes [C] and all smooth functions f.

There's more information in my posts in this thread and the one I linked to from there.

The fact that ##\big((\mathrm dx^1)_p,\dots,(\mathrm dx^n)_p\big)## is the dual of ##\big(\frac{\partial}{\partial x^1}\big|_p,\dots,\frac{\partial}{\partial x^n}\big|_p\big)## is a straighforward consequence of the definition of the ##\mathrm d## operation. The definition is ##(\mathrm df)_p(v)=v(f)## for all smooth ##f:M\to\mathbb R## and all ##v\in T_pM##, so we have
$$(\mathrm dx^i)_p\left(\frac{\partial}{\partial x^j}\bigg|_p\right) = \frac{\partial}{\partial x^j}\bigg|_p x^i =\delta^i_j.$$
 
Last edited:
Although Fredrik has explained it all, I thought this might be helpful as well.

In ordinary calculus in Euclidean space, vectors operate on functions by directional derivatives. If v is a vector, its action on a function,f, is

lim t ->0 (f( x + tv) - f(x))/t

Conversely one can define vectors at a point,x, as linear operators on functions that obey the Leibniz rule, that is : (v.fg) = (v.f)g(x) + (v.g)f(x)

One can show that such a "derivation" is equal to a directional derivative for some vector.

Similarly df(v) is is defined by the same limit. The way I learned it was that the Jacobian matrix of a function is a linear map between vector spaces. For instance, the gradient of a function is a linear map from n space to the real numbers.The notation df is the invariant way to describe the Jacobian.

As Fredrik explained, on a manifold one only has directional derivatives in a coordinate chart so some notion of equivalence under change of charts is needed. One way to define vectors invariantly without reference to coordinate charts is as equivalence classes of smooth curves at a point, another is as derivations.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K