MHB Vectors in Planes: Solving for m & n, Finding Orthogonal Plane

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lancelot1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Planes Vectors
Lancelot1
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
Hiya,

I have a question in high school math, vectors to be precise:

The point K(3.5,-0.5,-2) is the intersection point of the plane S1: mx-7my+5z+3=0 with the line l1: (n,1,-2)+t(-1,1,0)

a) find the parameters n and m
b) find the equation of the plane that contains the line l1 and is orthogonal to the plane S1.
c) Another line is given, l2: (2,0,-1)+t(3,-3,0). Find the area of the parallelogram which has two vertices on l2 and to other vertices are K, and another point E(1,2,-2) which is on l1.

I managed to solve (a) and found that m=1, n=2 and t=-1.5.

I need your assistance with the other part of the question.

Thank you.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Lancelot said:
Hiya,

I have a question in high school math, vectors to be precise:

The point K(3.5,-0.5,-2) is the intersection point of the plane S1: mx-7my+5z+3=0 with the line l1: (n,1,-2)+t(-1,1,0)

a) find the parameters n and m
b) find the equation of the plane that contains the line l1 and is orthogonal to the plane S1.
c) Another line is given, l2: (2,0,-1)+t(3,-3,0). Find the area of the parallelogram which has two vertices on l2 and to other vertices are K, and another point E(1,2,-2) which is on l1.

I managed to solve (a) and found that m=1, n=2 and t=-1.5.

I need your assistance with the other part of the question.

Thank you.

a) To find the parameters $n$ and $m$, we can plug in the coordinates of the given point to the plane and the line:

$$m(3.5)-7m(-0.5)+5(-2)+3=0$$

Solving for $m$, we find:

$$m=1\quad\checkmark$$

$$n-t=3.5$$

$$t+1=-0.5$$

Adding, we obtain:

$$n+1=3\implies n=2\quad\checkmark$$

b) To find a plane, all we need is a point in the plane, and a vector perpendicular to the plane. Can you find those?
 
For (b) let the unknown plane be Ax+ By+ Cz= D. Since it is perpendicular to mx- 7my+ 5z+ 3= 0, its normal vector must be perpendicular to the normal vector of that plane: mA- 7mB+ 5C= 0. The fact that line (n,1,-2)+t(-1,1,0) lies in the plane means that A(n- t)+ B(1+ t)- 2C= D for all t. We already know that m= 1 and n= 2 so those equations become A- 14B+ 5C= 0 and A(2- t)+ B(1+ t)- 2C= 2A- At+ B+ Bt- 2C= (B- A)t+ 2A+ B- 2C= D for all t. Since that last equation is true for all t, corresponding coefficients must be equal: B- A= 0, 2A+ B- 2C= D.

We have the three equations A- 14B+ 5C= 0, B- A= 0, and 2A+ B- 2C= D. Normally, three equations would not be enough to solve for four unknowns, but we could always add or multiply Ax+ By+ Cz= D by a non-zero number to get another equation for the same plane. In particular, we can assume, say, that D= 1 so we have A- 14B+ 5C= 0, B- A= 0, and 2A+ B- 2C= 1, three equations to solve for A, B, and C.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top