Vectors with appl of dot product

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around solving a physics problem involving vectors and the application of the dot product to find normal and parallel force components relative to a surface. Participants explore various methods to calculate these components, focusing on the correctness of their approaches.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes three methods for calculating the normal force, with varying results, particularly noting a discrepancy in the x-component from Method 3.
  • Another participant asserts that the normal vector should have no x-component, suggesting that the result from Method 3 is incorrect.
  • A further reply challenges the approach used to determine the parallel force, indicating that the direction of F(parallel) cannot simply follow the position vector along the surface.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express disagreement regarding the validity of Method 3 and the calculation of the parallel force, indicating that multiple competing views remain unresolved.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved assumptions regarding the definitions of normal and parallel forces, as well as the geometric interpretations of the vectors involved.

teknodude
Messages
150
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to solve this problem with different approaches. Link is here

http://img138.imageshack.us/img138/2268/problem1eb1.th.png
the answer is 0i + 0.0927j + 0.0232 k lb* Means DOT

Method one: Find the force in scalar components. Then Take the cross product of two position vectors to get a normal vector (V) to the surface. THen take the unit vector of V. Then F(normal) = (V*F)V
THis method worked F(normal)= 0i + 0.0927j + 0.0232 k lb


Method 2: Find the force in scalar components. Draw a perpendicular line to the surface and by similar triangles the normal vector V is 8j + 2k. Take the units vector of V. Then F(normal) = (V*F)V
THis method worked F(normal)= 0i + 0.0927j + 0.0232 k lb

Method 3: This one i tried taking a position vector along the surface like from point A to point J. Position vector AJ = 0i-1j+4k. THen getting of units vector, unit vector eAJ = 0i - 0.2425j + 0.9701k.

THen F(parallel)= (eAJ*F)eAJ

F(normal) = F- F(parallel)
F(normal) = -0.1231 i + 0.0927j + 0.0232 k lb

THe only difference is the x-component, which differs a little. Is this answer still right? I didn;t round any numbers when calculating.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The normal to that surface would by definition have no x-component, so the Method 3 answer is wrong. I'm not understanding what you are trying to do in that method, so I'm not able to figure out what is wrong.
 
Almost forgot about this.

Here's the work that I did for method 3.
 

Attachments

The manner in which you obtain the F (parallel) is incorrect. The direction of F (parallel) is not simply AJ just because AJ lies on the surface of the slope.

To visualize F (parallel), try imagining the shadow of the string on the sloped surface if a light source is at some point above (though not exactly) the string.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
17K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K