Velocity and acceleration of a particle (polar coords)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the radial and transverse velocity and acceleration of a particle described by polar coordinates, specifically with the equations r=e^t and θ=t. Participants are exploring the implications of these equations on the particle's motion.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants attempt to derive the velocity and acceleration by differentiating the position vector in polar coordinates. Questions arise regarding the nature of the transverse acceleration and why it appears to be non-zero despite the definitions of r and θ.

Discussion Status

Some participants express confusion about the relationship between the radial and transverse components of motion, particularly regarding the angle between the velocity and radius as time progresses. Others have verified calculations using Cartesian coordinates, suggesting that the results, while not intuitive, are correct.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the calculations involve assumptions about the behavior of velocity and acceleration in polar coordinates, and there is a recognition of the complexity in interpreting the results. The discussion also highlights the potential for misunderstanding the relationship between angular velocity and radial distance.

Rct33
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I am asked to find the radial and transverse velocity and acceleration for a particle with polar coordinates r=e^t and \theta=t

The Attempt at a Solution


Therefore let the position of the particle be \underline{r}=\underline{\hat{r}}e^t

$$\therefore \dot{\underline{r}}=\frac{\mathrm{d} }{\mathrm{d} t}(\underline{\hat{r}})e^t+\frac{\mathrm{d} }{\mathrm{d} t}(e^t)\underline{\hat{r}}$$

But \underline{\hat{r}}=\cos\theta\underline{\hat{i}}+\sin\theta\underline{\hat{j}}

$$\therefore\dot{\underline{r}}=\frac{\mathrm{d} \theta}{\mathrm{d} t}\frac{\mathrm{d} }{\mathrm{d} \theta}(\cos\theta\underline{\hat{i}}+\sin\theta\underline{\hat{j}})e^t+e^t\underline{\hat{r}}$$

$$=(-\sin\theta\underline{\hat{i}}+\cos\theta\underline{\hat{j}})e^t +e^t\underline{\hat{r}}$$

\therefore \underline{\hat{r}}=e^t\underline{\hat{\theta}}+e^t\underline{\hat{r}}

This is the particles velocity, the acceleration is given by:
$$\ddot{\underline{r}}=\frac{\mathrm{d} }{\mathrm{d} t}(\underline{\hat{\theta}}e^t+\underline{\hat{r}}e^t)$$

$$=\frac{\mathrm{d} }{\mathrm{d} t}(\underline{\hat{\theta}})e^t+\frac{\mathrm{d} }{\mathrm{d} t}(e^t)\underline{\hat{\theta}}+\frac{\mathrm{d} }{\mathrm{d} t}(\underline{\hat{r}})e^t+\frac{\mathrm{d} }{\mathrm{d} t}(e^t)\underline{\hat{r}}$$

$$=\frac{\mathrm{d} \theta}{\mathrm{d} t}\frac{\mathrm{d} }{\mathrm{d} \theta}(-\sin\theta\underline{\hat{i}}+\cos\theta\underline{\hat{j}})e^t+e^t \underline{\hat{\theta}}+e^t\underline{\hat{\theta}}+e^t\underline{\hat{r}}$$

$$=-e^t\underline{\hat{r}}+e^t\underline{\hat{\theta}}+e^t \underline{\hat{\theta}}+e^t\underline{\hat{r}}$$

$$=2e^t\underline{\hat{\theta}}$$

This is an acceleration in the transverse direction. But if \theta=t and r=e^t then why do I get an acceleration in the transverse direction, and not the radial direction? Is the transverse velocity not constant (I also got e^t\underline{\hat{\theta}} for transverse velocity, why is this?) Help is very much appreciated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Rct33 said:

Homework Statement


I am asked to find the radial and transverse velocity and acceleration for a particle with polar coordinates r=e^t and \theta=t

The Attempt at a Solution


Therefore let the position of the particle be \underline{r}=\underline{\hat{r}}e^t

$$\therefore \dot{\underline{r}}=\frac{\mathrm{d} }{\mathrm{d} t}(\underline{\hat{r}})e^t+\frac{\mathrm{d} }{\mathrm{d} t}(e^t)\underline{\hat{r}}$$

But \underline{\hat{r}}=\cos\theta\underline{\hat{i}}+\sin\theta\underline{\hat{j}}

$$\therefore\dot{\underline{r}}=\frac{\mathrm{d} \theta}{\mathrm{d} t}\frac{\mathrm{d} }{\mathrm{d} \theta}(\cos\theta\underline{\hat{i}}+\sin\theta\underline{\hat{j}})e^t+e^t\underline{\hat{r}}$$

$$=(-\sin\theta\underline{\hat{i}}+\cos\theta\underline{\hat{j}})e^t +e^t\underline{\hat{r}}$$

\therefore \underline{\hat{r}}=e^t\underline{\hat{\theta}}+e^t\underline{\hat{r}}

This is the particles velocity, the acceleration is given by:
$$\ddot{\underline{r}}=\frac{\mathrm{d} }{\mathrm{d} t}(\underline{\hat{\theta}}e^t+\underline{\hat{r}}e^t)$$

$$=\frac{\mathrm{d} }{\mathrm{d} t}(\underline{\hat{\theta}})e^t+\frac{\mathrm{d} }{\mathrm{d} t}(e^t)\underline{\hat{\theta}}+\frac{\mathrm{d} }{\mathrm{d} t}(\underline{\hat{r}})e^t+\frac{\mathrm{d} }{\mathrm{d} t}(e^t)\underline{\hat{r}}$$

$$=\frac{\mathrm{d} \theta}{\mathrm{d} t}\frac{\mathrm{d} }{\mathrm{d} \theta}(-\sin\theta\underline{\hat{i}}+\cos\theta\underline{\hat{j}})e^t+e^t \underline{\hat{\theta}}+e^t\underline{\hat{\theta}}+e^t\underline{\hat{r}}$$

$$=-e^t\underline{\hat{r}}+e^t\underline{\hat{\theta}}+e^t \underline{\hat{\theta}}+e^t\underline{\hat{r}}$$

$$=2e^t\underline{\hat{\theta}}$$

This is an acceleration in the transverse direction. But if \theta=t and r=e^t then why do I get an acceleration in the transverse direction, and not the radial direction? Is the transverse velocity not constant (I also got e^t\underline{\hat{\theta}} for transverse velocity, why is this?) Help is very much appreciated

I agree with you that something just doesn't seem right about all this. The first thing is that it seems, because ##{dθ \over dt} = 1##, that the angle between the velocity and the radius should go to zero as t gets large. But the formula suggests the angle is a constant ##θ + {\pi \over 4}##. So this looks highly suspect.

The second odd thing is that the acceleration is perpendicular to the radius. This seems to imply that the radial velocity is constant, that the acceleration is only adding to the rotational velocity of the vector, but as ##{dθ \over dt} = 1##, this looks doubly wrong.

After a lot of thought, I am convinced that these calculations are correct. The tangential velocity is proportional to the radius (why?), and the radial velocity is proportional to the radius (why?), so the angle of the velocity must be ##θ + {\pi \over 4}##.

And the acceleration, being not perpendicular to the velocity, lengthens and rotates it. And because the velocity is at a constant angle to the radius, the radial velocity is lengthened when the velocity is lengthened.

So the strangeness can be explained way.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
I just checked that the calculations done are right by doing everything in Cartesian coordinates. Then the motion is given by
\vec{r}(t)=\exp t [\cos t \hat{x}+\sin t \hat{y}].
Since \hat{x} and \hat{y} are constant, you can easily do the derivatives wrt. t, and then you can find the components of velocity and acceleration simply by taking the dot products with the polar-coordinates orthonormal basis
\hat{r}=\cos t \hat{x} + \sin t \hat{y}, \quad \hat{\theta}=-\sin t \hat{x} + \cos t \hat{y}
along the trajectory. I admit, the solution is not so intuitive but correct :-).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
verty said:
I agree with you that something just doesn't seem right about all this. The first thing is that it seems, because ##{dθ \over dt} = 1##, that the angle between the velocity and the radius should go to zero as t gets large. But the formula suggests the angle is a constant ##θ + {\pi \over 4}##. So this looks highly suspect.

The second odd thing is that the acceleration is perpendicular to the radius. This seems to imply that the radial velocity is constant, that the acceleration is only adding to the rotational velocity of the vector, but as ##{dθ \over dt} = 1##, this looks doubly wrong.

After a lot of thought, I am convinced that these calculations are correct. The tangential velocity is proportional to the radius (why?), and the radial velocity is proportional to the radius (why?), so the angle of the velocity must be ##θ + {\pi \over 4}##.

And the acceleration, being not perpendicular to the velocity, lengthens and rotates it. And because the velocity is at a constant angle to the radius, the radial velocity is lengthened when the velocity is lengthened.

So the strangeness can be explained way.

This makes sense after thinking about it, thanks for your help! It is kinda simple now that you explained it too :p
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K