How Can You Solve a Differential Equation Involving Exponential Drag Force?

  • Thread starter Thread starter MichaelTam
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force Velocity
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving a differential equation involving a particle subjected to an exponential drag force, represented by the equation 𝐅⃗=−𝑏𝑒^(𝑐𝑣)𝐢̂. Participants clarify that the force acting on the particle is dependent on its velocity and is directed against its motion. The key steps involve applying Newton's second law (F=ma) to derive the differential equation and isolating the exponential term for integration. The final solution for the speed as a function of time is expressed as v(t) = -1/c ln(e^(-c v_0) + bc/m t).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's second law (F=ma)
  • Knowledge of differential equations and integration techniques
  • Familiarity with exponential functions and natural logarithms
  • Basic concepts of forces and motion in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study techniques for solving first-order differential equations
  • Learn about exponential decay and its applications in physics
  • Explore integration methods, particularly definite vs. indefinite integrals
  • Investigate more complex scenarios involving multi-dimensional motion and drag forces
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, particularly those focusing on classical mechanics, as well as anyone interested in applying calculus to solve real-world problems involving motion and forces.

  • #31
MichaelTam said:
So, using the post equation in 19, I got 2, but using the 25post ,I get 1.
View attachment 268528
I have no idea how you keep getting ##e^{-c v_0} = e^{-c v_t}##. Where does that come from?
What I wrote in post #21 was, suppose we allow a constant of integration, k:
##e^{-c v_0} - e^{-c v_t}=\frac {-b c t} m+k##
If we evaluate that at t=0 we get:
##e^{-c v_0} - e^{-c v_0}=0+k##
Look carefully at the left hand side. Everything cancels there, leaving zero, so k=0.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Your problem is that you do not understand the difference between a definite integral and an indefinite integral.
1. Definite integral
$$\int_{x_0}^x u~du=\frac{1}{2} \left. u^2 \right |_{x_0}^x=\frac{1}{2}x^2-\frac{1}{2}x_0^2.$$You just evaluate the antiderivative at the upper and lower limits and subtract the latter from the former.

2. Indefinite integral
$$\int u~du=\frac{1}{2} u^2 +k.$$There are no upper and lower limits; constant ##k## is a placeholder for the lower limit. In this particular problem you have a definite integral, you know the lower limit, therefore the placeholder is not needed or, as has already been shown, it must be zero.
 
  • #33
So, is my answer in the equation two is the simplest answer?
Why my answer in the equation 2 is still incorrect?
 
  • #34
Ops, I find my self have some typing error, the answer in the equation two is correct, thank you kuruman and haruspex!
 
  • #35
Are there any way to learn more calculus to get more strategy?
 
  • #36
MichaelTam said:
Are there any way to learn more calculus to get more strategy?
It looks like you need to reread integration basics, paying attention to bounds and to definite and indefinite integrals.
 
  • #37
I got v(t) = -1/c ln( e^(-c v_0) + bc/m t ).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: deepread
  • #38
ThEmptyTree said:
I got v(t) = -1/c ln( e^(-c v_0) + bc/m t ).
Good.
 
  • #39
MichaelTam said:
Homework Statement:: MIT pretest.
Relevant Equations:: 𝐅⃗=−𝑏𝑒^(𝑐𝑣)𝐢̂ , find v(t), by using differential equation of F=maHello, would you mind sharing what course this is? I am familiar with edx but can’t find it
 
  • #42
This problem becomes more complex if we alter the initial condition of ##v_0## to be not parallel to x-axis but to have some other direction. For example if ##v_0## is in the y-axis then the differential equation becomes $$m\frac{dv_x}{dt}=-be^{c\sqrt{v_0^2+v_x^2}}$$ and who can solve this
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
10K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K