Problem with a Differential in a Non Inertial System.

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving a ball inside a rotating tube and its motion described by a differential equation. The context includes dynamics in a non-inertial reference frame, focusing on the forces acting on the ball and a hanging block.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to derive the motion of the ball using a differential equation that incorporates centrifugal force and gravitational force. They express confusion regarding the behavior of the solution when varying the mass of the hanging block.
  • Participants question the nature of the solutions, particularly regarding exponential growth and decay, and clarify the mathematical representation of these solutions.
  • Some participants explore the implications of the equilibrium point and its stability, discussing the expected behavior of the system when perturbed.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the mathematical aspects of the problem, clarifying the forms of the solutions and their implications. There is a productive exploration of the dynamics involved, particularly concerning the stability of the equilibrium point and the behavior of the system under different conditions.

Contextual Notes

There are discussions about initial conditions and the nature of the solutions, including the potential for exponential behavior in both increasing and decreasing scenarios. The conversation reflects uncertainty about the implications of the mass of the hanging block on the system's dynamics.

paalfis
Messages
69
Reaction score
2
A ball of mass 'm' is inside of a tube that rotates in a horizontal plane around the vertical axis (Drawing a circunference). Attached to the ball (inside of the tube) there is a massless, inextensible rope that goes to the midpoint of the circle described by the rotating tube. The other end of the rope is attached to a hanging block of mass 'M'. Describe the motion of the ball in terms of its position as a function of time.
2. Homework Equations


My non inercial reference system was x parallel to the tube, z perpendicular to the plane (in the opposite direction of the hanging block) and y in the plane but perpendicular to x.
After solving the dynamics of the problem, the differential I got (I think it is correct) was:

m * w2 * x - M*g = (m+M) * x''

where w is the angular speed of the tube and x is the position of the ball along the tube starting from the center of the circumference described by it. x'' is the acceleration of the ball along the tube, which is the same of the acceleration of the hanging block. Of course, the first term is the centrifugal force and the second one is the weight of the block.

The Attempt at a Solution



Now my problem is the next one. When solving this differential (proposing for the homogeneous solution: A * eL*t , and for the particular solution x''=0) I only got a solution where x increases exponential with time, but what about the other case, in which the hanging block is heavier and x decreases with time?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Actually, after putting in the initial conditions (x'(t=0)=0 and x(t=0)=R/2 , where R is the length of the tube) the solution (which was something like A1*eL*t+A2*E-L*t+particular solution ) has A1=A2= 1/2 * [ (R/2 - [ (M*g)/(m*w2) ] ] which makes sense, it is negative for heavier blocks. Is this correct?
 
The equilibrium (x = Mg/(mw^2)) is unstable and regardless of how you deviate from it. Thus, you should expect to get exponentially increasing solutions on both sides. In one case x will grow exponentially and in the other it will decrease exponentially away from the equilibrium point. The only thing is that in the decreasing solution, there is an obvious change of dynamics when the ball reaches x = 0.
 
Right, right.. Can you please clarify a little bit more about the exponentially decreasing part? do you mean something like -eL*t or something like -e-L*t ?
 
I would guess you mean -eL*t , right?
 
paalfis said:
do you mean something like -exp(L*t)

This was what I intended, e.g., when the ball starts out at a radius shorter than the equilibrium point at zero velocity. As you have already discovered, the solutions are given in terms of exponential functions also with exp(-Lt). A more convenient parametrization of these are cosh(Lt) and sinh(Lt).
 
Thanks!
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
8K