Velocity of a rocket which never returns to earth

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the speed at which a rocket must be fired upward to ensure it never returns to Earth, focusing on gravitational forces and the dynamics of rocket motion as described by differential equations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of the rocket's mass and exhaust velocity on its trajectory, with some questioning the assumptions made about constant exhaust velocity and the effects of gravity.
  • There is discussion about the concept of escape velocity and whether it can be derived from the equations presented, with some participants suggesting that additional knowledge may be necessary.
  • One participant raises a point about the duration of thrust affecting the outcome, indicating a need for clarity on the problem's parameters.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants sharing insights about escape velocity and its relevance to the problem. There is recognition of ambiguity in the question, and some guidance has been offered regarding the need for a deeper understanding of the concepts involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem is presented in a calculus textbook, which may imply certain assumptions or prior knowledge that are not explicitly stated in the problem itself.

process91
Messages
105
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


With what speed should a rocket be fired upward so that it never returns to earth? (Neglect all forces except the Earth's gravitational attraction)


Homework Equations


The ONLY thing gone over so far involving rockets is the following formula:
Let the altitude of the rocket at time t be r(t), the mass be m(t) and the velocity of the exhaust matter, relative to the rocket be c(t). Then
m(t)r''(t)=-m'(t)c(t)-m(t)g

This is in a section focusing on differential equations.


The Attempt at a Solution


Solving for r'':
r''(t) = - \frac{m'(t)}{m(t)} c(t) - g

And now I don't really know where to go. I can't operate directly on this without making some assumptions about m and c, and based on the problems that we have worked on so far the procedure was similar to this:

Assume c(t) is constant, so c(t)=-c.

Let w be the initial weight of the rocket and fuel. Let k be the rate at which fuel is consumed. Then
m(t)=\frac{w-kt}{g} and m'(t) = -\frac{k}{g}.

Now we have
r''(t)=\frac{kc}{w-kt}-g

Integrating and using the initial condition r'(0)=0:
r'(t)=-c\ln(\frac{w-kt}{w})-gt

Integrating again and using the initial condition r(0)=0:
r(t)=\frac{c(w-kt)}{w}ln(\frac{w-kt}{w})-\frac{1}{2}gt^2+ct

It seems to me that, for this question, this model will not work. No matter what, gravity will pull back down. I really think I need to use a formula for gravity dependent on r(t) in order for this to work. Incidentally, the answer in the book is 6.96 mi/sec.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
process91 said:

Homework Statement


With what speed should a rocket be fired upward so that it never returns to earth? (Neglect all forces except the Earth's gravitational attraction)


Homework Equations


The ONLY thing gone over so far involving rockets is the following formula:
Let the altitude of the rocket at time t be r(t), the mass be m(t) and the velocity of the exhaust matter, relative to the rocket be c(t). Then
m(t)r''(t)=-m'(t)c(t)-m(t)g

This is in a section focusing on differential equations.


The Attempt at a Solution


Solving for r'':
r''(t) = - \frac{m'(t)}{m(t)} c(t) - g

And now I don't really know where to go. I can't operate directly on this without making some assumptions about m and c, and based on the problems that we have worked on so far the procedure was similar to this:

Assume c(t) is constant, so c(t)=-c.

Let w be the initial weight of the rocket and fuel. Let k be the rate at which fuel is consumed. Then
m(t)=\frac{w-kt}{g} and m'(t) = -\frac{k}{g}.

Now we have
r''(t)=\frac{kc}{w-kt}-g

Integrating and using the initial condition r'(0)=0:
r'(t)=-c\ln(\frac{w-kt}{w})-gt

Integrating again and using the initial condition r(0)=0:
r(t)=\frac{c(w-kt)}{w}ln(\frac{w-kt}{w})-\frac{1}{2}gt^2+ct

It seems to me that, for this question, this model will not work. No matter what, gravity will pull back down. I really think I need to use a formula for gravity dependent on r(t) in order for this to work. Incidentally, the answer in the book is 6.96 mi/sec.

Try searching the topic "escape velocity" and see what you find. You could even look up escape velocity in the Index of your textbook.
 
I did some reading on escape velocity, and it does seem that is what I need. Just to be clear - this cannot be calculated from the equations I presented, correct?
 
This question doesn't make sense. It matters how long the thrusters are on. If the engine can provide 1m/s velocity forever then the rocket will never return.
 
Yes, I agree, the question has some ambiguity. This question is in a very well respected calculus book, Apostol's Calculus Vol I. Since the answer is equal to the escape velocity for earth, I assume some outside knowledge is required (literally the only equations talking about rockets in the book are the ones I presented).
 
process91 said:
I did some reading on escape velocity, and it does seem that is what I need. Just to be clear - this cannot be calculated from the equations I presented, correct?

I don't think so.

Note: when they did the Moon trips in 1969,70, etc, they went very close to giving the craft escape velocity, which is why they had to be aimed carefully so the moon itself would swing them round and send them back to the Earth of anything went wrong - like with Apollo 13.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
6K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
5K
Replies
13
Views
2K