Velocity of Second Piece After Explosion

  • Thread starter Thread starter turnip
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Falling Momentum
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a ball falling freely under gravity that explodes into two equal parts when its downward speed reaches 8 m/s. One part ascends to a height of 12 m, and the task is to determine the velocity of the other part immediately after the explosion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss using kinematic equations to relate distance, velocity, and acceleration. There is uncertainty about the appropriate formulas and methods to apply, particularly regarding time and the effects of gravity.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on using conservation of momentum and kinematic equations. There is an ongoing exploration of the correct approach to find the velocities involved, with multiple interpretations of the equations being discussed.

Contextual Notes

Participants express confusion over the application of certain equations and the assumptions made regarding initial and final velocities. There is a recognition of the need to clarify the relationship between the pieces' velocities post-explosion and the initial conditions of the system.

turnip
Messages
30
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A ball is falling freely under the action of gravity. When its downward speed is 8m/s, it explodes into two equal parts. One part goes straight up to a height of 12m above the explosion point. What is the velocity of the other part just after the explosion?


Homework Equations


initial = final
P1 +P2 = P1 + P2


The Attempt at a Solution


i know that the other piece goes with a force downwards
iam not sure how to start this
i figure the straight line motion equation s= ut +1/2 at(squared) could be used?
when the object reaches 12 meters, the velocity would be 0 as gravity would be decelerating it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
turnip said:
i figure the straight line motion equation s= ut +1/2 at(squared) could be used?
You could, but you'll need another step since you don't have the time. Better would be to use another kinematic formula, one that relates velocity, distance, and acceleration.
when the object reaches 12 meters, the velocity would be 0 as gravity would be decelerating it.
Good.
 
iam sorry but i don't know of a kinetic formula that relates velocity, distance, and acceleration.
could you please tell me it?
 
okay so i used the a=x/t equaltion and got a time of 117.6s

put that into the d=ut +1/2 at(squared) formula saying that acceleration was -9.8 and rearranged for u. i got an answer of 4.9

i then timesed the time by 9.8 to get 1152.48 and added 4.9 on to it to get the total speed but this didn't work out when the actual answer is 31.3m/s downward
where did i go wrong?
 
turnip said:
okay so i used the a=x/t equaltion and got a time of 117.6s
That's not a valid equation. Where did you get it? Do a sanity check: how far would an object fall in 117.6 seconds?

You can either find that formula that relates distance, velocity, and acceleration, or you can do it in two steps: Find the time it takes to fall 12m (which is the same as the time to rise to a max height of 12m), then use that to find the speed you would attain at the end of that 12m fall.

Once you get the speed of the piece that shot upwards, you'd use conservation of momentum to find the speed of the other piece.
 
haha yeah it was morning and i was very tired when i wrote that down :P

right, so for me to find the velocity of the above object could i use the v(squared)=u(squared) + 2as formula?

i did this saying that its final speed was zero. i then got an answer of 15.33 m/s

with the conservation of momentum i divided m by all of the equation as m was in every part of mv + mv = mv + mv
-then i ruled out the first final velocity because it is zero
so the equation looked like this: 15.33 + 23.33 = v2f
i said the second initial velocity was 23.33 as it was already traveling at 8m/s

obviously this is wrong from the answer of 31.3m/s
i did think of taking the 8m/s off the 15.33 and then adding it onto the 23.33 but got an answer of 30.66 which is still wrong
 
turnip said:
right, so for me to find the velocity of the above object could i use the v(squared)=u(squared) + 2as formula?

i did this saying that its final speed was zero. i then got an answer of 15.33 m/s
Good. That's the speed of the upward-moving piece immediately after the explosion.

with the conservation of momentum i divided m by all of the equation as m was in every part of mv + mv = mv + mv
In general, you'd better write that equation as: m1v1i + m2v2i = m1v1f + m2v2f,
where initial and final refer to just before and just after the explosion.

In this case, since they told you the pieces were identical, m1 = m2 and the m cancels:
v1i + v2i = v1f + v2f

You are given the initial velocity (v1i = v2i): 8 m/s down, so call it -8 m/s.

You just figured out the final velocity of one piece (m1 say) as being 15.33 m/s up, so call it v1f = +15.33 m/s. Now you can solve for v2f.

FYI: the velocity of m1 just after the explosion is 15.33, not 15.33 + 8 (or 15.33 - 8, for that matter!). Remember you figured out the velocity based on how high it reached, so that includes everything already.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K