Velocity vectors in three dimensions

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around expressing and manipulating velocity vectors in three-dimensional polar coordinates. The original poster seeks to understand how to represent two velocity vectors, v1 and v2, using polar and azimuthal angles, and how to compute their relative velocity without converting to Cartesian coordinates.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the representation of velocity vectors in spherical coordinates and question whether the polar angles provide sufficient information. There is a discussion about the challenges of performing operations directly in spherical coordinates versus converting to Cartesian coordinates for ease of computation.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered insights into the conversion between coordinate systems and the computation of relative velocity, while others are focused on maintaining the original spherical representation without conversion. Multiple interpretations of the problem are being explored, with no explicit consensus reached.

Contextual Notes

The original poster emphasizes a need to avoid Cartesian coordinates and seeks a purely spherical angle-based expression for relative velocity. There is an indication of a lack of clarity regarding the operations between the vectors in the spherical coordinate system.

Mattew
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hi everybody,
I have a quite simple question (in my opinion) but my background is quite poor about three dimensions physics.
I need to express two velocity vectors, v1 and v2, in three dimensions polar coordinates, which means using polar and azimuthal angles. The two polar angles represent enough information to define the velocity vector?
Then what I'm concerned about is how to do operations between theese two vectors: in particular I'd have to compute the relative velocity of the two objects moving according to the velocity vectors above, how can I do it using sin and cos of the polar angles (teta1,phi1) of v1 and (teta2,phi2) of v2?
Thanks in adavance for your time and help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you tried expressing the velocity vectors, presumably already given in rectangular cartesian unit vectors (i, j, k) in mutually orthogonal unit vectors in the spherical coordinate system? Or do you have trouble doing that?
 
Let me see if I get it: in this coordinate system the location of a point p in the sphere is defined by a triple (r,teta,phi), where r is the distance of the point from the origin, teta is the angle between the vector connecting p to the origin and the z-axis, and phi is the angle between the projection of p on the x-y plane and the x-axis. Is that right?
Having that, in this system a velocity vector could be defined by r as its magnitude, and the teta/phi as the direction on movement, isn't it?
Now, if we have v1=(r1,teta1,phi1) and v2=(r2,teta2,phi2), how do I compute the relative velocity of the two objects?
I hope I'm not too confusing...
 
You compute v1-v2. This is hard to do directly in spherical coordinates - so convert to (x,y,z) first. Then you can just subtract component by component - then convert back to spherical coordinates if you need to.

Eg. z=r*cos(theta)
x=r*sin(theta)*cos(phi)
y=r*sin(theta)*sin(phi)
 
Thanks, I was looking for a way to do it without introduncing x,y,z at all. I actually need to express it in a proof by means of the spherical angles and magnitude, but I need no computations...only the relative velocity as a function of the original spherical angles of v1 and v2 (let's immagine we got the two vectors (and relative angles, teta/phi) drawn in a 3d coordinate system and we want to paint the relative velocity velocity vector v1-v2 with the angles directly by sin/cos of teta1/phi1 and teta2/phi2-no change of coordinate system.
 

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 72 ·
3
Replies
72
Views
9K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K