A Velocity Verlet for relativistic simulation

  • Thread starter Thread starter Philip Koeck
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
Using the Velocity Verlet algorithm for simulating a fast electron intersecting slower electrons is debated, particularly due to its limitations with velocity-dependent accelerations. The fast electron's velocity is nearly constant, which may justify its use in this specific scenario. However, an alternative approach involving four-vectors is suggested, as it maintains a constant magnitude and relates to the Lorentz force law through four momentum. This method could provide a more accurate representation of relativistic effects. The discussion highlights the importance of considering different algorithms for complex simulations.
Philip Koeck
Gold Member
Messages
801
Reaction score
229
I'm simulating a situation that's partly relativistic and I'm wondering if it's wise to use Velocity Verlet.

A fast electron (200 keV or roughly 208 000 000 m/s) travels along the z-axis and intersects a beam of slower electrons (1 keV or roughly 20 000 000 m/s) that are moving along the x-axis.

I treat the slower electrons as non-relativistic.

For the fast electron I assume it's travelling essentially in the z-direction at all times, which is very accurate as far as I can see.
So I use the parallel corrected mass in the z-direction and the orthogonal in x and y to get the acceleration of the fast electron at every time step.

I realise that velocity verlet is not intended for accelerations that are velocity-dependent, but in this case the velocity of the fast electron is almost constant so γ and γ3 are almost constant during the whole simulation.

Does it sound okay to use Velocity Verlet in this case or should I consider a different algorithm?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know the answer to your question about the integrator, but you could try working with four-vectors. The four velocity has a constant magnitude by definition and the Lorentz force law relates to it via the four momentum which is the invariant mass times the four velocity.
 
  • Like
Likes Philip Koeck
Moderator's note: Spin-off from another thread due to topic change. In the second link referenced, there is a claim about a physical interpretation of frame field. Consider a family of observers whose worldlines fill a region of spacetime. Each of them carries a clock and a set of mutually orthogonal rulers. Each observer points in the (timelike) direction defined by its worldline's tangent at any given event along it. What about the rulers each of them carries ? My interpretation: each...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
6K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K