Graduate Velocity Verlet for relativistic simulation

  • Thread starter Thread starter Philip Koeck
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
Using the Velocity Verlet algorithm for simulating a fast electron intersecting slower electrons is debated, particularly due to its limitations with velocity-dependent accelerations. The fast electron's velocity is nearly constant, which may justify its use in this specific scenario. However, an alternative approach involving four-vectors is suggested, as it maintains a constant magnitude and relates to the Lorentz force law through four momentum. This method could provide a more accurate representation of relativistic effects. The discussion highlights the importance of considering different algorithms for complex simulations.
Philip Koeck
Gold Member
Messages
801
Reaction score
229
I'm simulating a situation that's partly relativistic and I'm wondering if it's wise to use Velocity Verlet.

A fast electron (200 keV or roughly 208 000 000 m/s) travels along the z-axis and intersects a beam of slower electrons (1 keV or roughly 20 000 000 m/s) that are moving along the x-axis.

I treat the slower electrons as non-relativistic.

For the fast electron I assume it's travelling essentially in the z-direction at all times, which is very accurate as far as I can see.
So I use the parallel corrected mass in the z-direction and the orthogonal in x and y to get the acceleration of the fast electron at every time step.

I realise that velocity verlet is not intended for accelerations that are velocity-dependent, but in this case the velocity of the fast electron is almost constant so γ and γ3 are almost constant during the whole simulation.

Does it sound okay to use Velocity Verlet in this case or should I consider a different algorithm?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know the answer to your question about the integrator, but you could try working with four-vectors. The four velocity has a constant magnitude by definition and the Lorentz force law relates to it via the four momentum which is the invariant mass times the four velocity.
 
  • Like
Likes Philip Koeck
A good one to everyone. My previous post on this subject here on the forum was a fiasco. I’d like to apologize to everyone who did their best to comment and got ignored by me. In defence, I could tell you I had really little time to spend on discussion, and just overlooked the explanations that seemed irrelevant (why they seemed irrelevant, I will tell you at the end of this). Before we get to the point, I will kindly ask you to comment having considered this text carefully, because...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
7K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K