Venturi Metter - Conceptual Question

  • Thread starter Thread starter FutureEnginr
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Conceptual Venturi
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the analysis of a multi-piezometric tube Venturi meter, specifically examining pressure and flow measurements across various pipe sections. The setup includes a 26mm diameter pipe, a 16mm throat, and a control valve in a 55mm pipe, with measurements taken at nine points (A-H). The user summarizes their understanding of pressure changes throughout the system, noting how pressure builds and drops in relation to flow and pipe diameter changes. The advice given includes comparing average pressures to the radius and cross-sectional area of the pipe sections to identify relationships.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of fluid dynamics principles, particularly Bernoulli's equation.
  • Familiarity with Venturi meter design and operation.
  • Knowledge of piezometric tube measurements and pressure differentials.
  • Basic skills in data analysis and interpretation of flow measurements.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the application of Bernoulli's equation in Venturi meters.
  • Learn about the impact of pipe diameter changes on flow rates and pressure drops.
  • Investigate methods for analyzing pressure data from piezometric tubes.
  • Explore the design and function of control valves in fluid systems.
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, fluid dynamics students, and professionals involved in hydraulic system design and analysis will benefit from this discussion, particularly those working with Venturi meters and pressure measurement techniques.

FutureEnginr
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I am working on a lab, and *think* I understand what is going on, but looking for a double check of my logic from someone more experience than I am.

In short its a multi-piezometric tube venturi meter, with 1 throat near the begining, a couple of expansions, and a control valve near the end. We took measurements at the various tubes, and I am trying to summarize the data qualitatively.

The 9 piezometric tubes on the pipe are setup as follows: (points A - H)

A) 26mm diameter pipe (13mm in front of the constriction, 25mm long)
B) 16mm throat (16 mm long as well)
C) 26mm pipe that comes after a gradually increasing pipe diameter
D) 51mm pipe that comes after a sharper increasing pipe diameter (totall diffuser = 89mm)
E) A control valve in the 55mm pipe
F) A straight 51 mm pipe section
G) A continued straight 51 mm pipe
H) The end of the meter (still 51 mm diameter pipe, total pipe length = 130 mm)

Here is my understanding is regarding the data we took
(sorry about the formatting, but hopefully you can understand my notes):

(flows) Q (l/s) A(mm) B(mm) C(mm) D(mm) E(mm) F(mm) G(mm) H(mm) I(mm)
flow 1 .18 370mm 332mm 360mm 356mm 360mm 318mm 324mm 322mm 222mm
flow 2 .24 330mm 274mm 320mm 316mm 324mm 254mm 262mm 260mm 160mm
flow 3 .28 370mm 284mm 350mm 346mm 354mm 260mm 272mm 270mm 168mm

Here is what I think happens as water flows through the meter...

'A' p builds due to upcoming constriction
'B' v increases, p drops as water is 'sucked' along
'C' p returns to almost state 'A' (losses occur)
'D' slight drop in p as area increases slightly
'E' p builds in front of valve obstruction
'F' p drops a little after passing valve
'G' p continues to drop as near opening
'H' p still dropping
'I' at end, p as close to 0 as possible (within this system).

Am I on the right track?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sounds pretty reasonable.

I am not any sort of expert in this matter, but did you try to compare the average pressures you found to the radius, cross-sectional area, or volume of the various pipe-sections to detect any relationship?
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K