Verification needed - Rollar Coaster

  • Thread starter Thread starter rkslperez04
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem related to energy conservation in a roller coaster scenario, specifically analyzing the speed of the coaster after ascending a second hill. The original poster is attempting to verify their calculations based on the principles of energy conservation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster presents their calculations and reasoning regarding the speed of the roller coaster after climbing a hill, indicating an understanding of energy conservation principles. Participants question the completeness of the problem statement and the assumptions made regarding the height of the second hill.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing feedback on the original poster's calculations and questioning the assumptions made about the height of the second hill. Some participants suggest refining the final answer for accuracy, while others seek clarification on the problem's details.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted lack of complete information regarding the specifics of the second hill, which is assumed to be 15 meters high based on the original poster's calculations. This assumption is critical for the analysis being conducted.

rkslperez04
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
Bare with me guys as I enlist your help through this worksheet. I really want to get a good grade on this upcoming test and this worksheet is our study guide.

I think I have the hang off it but I want to make sure I am grasping the questions here.

A rollar coaster is traveling on a horizontal track at 20 m/s. What is its speed after climbing the second hill.

I understand this to be an Ei=Ef problem.

Here is my work:

1/2MVi^2 = 1/2MVf^2 + GH ( all the mass variables cancel out )
1/2(20)^2 = 1/2(Vf)^2 + (9.8)(15)
200 = 1/2(Vf)^2 + 147
53 = 1/2(Vf)^2
53*2 = Vf^2
106 = Vf^2
Sq rt 106 is 10 m/s = Vf



am I close? Please let me know.. I want the right answer but I also want to comperhend what's going with these. Just wanted you to know I am not looking for someone to do my work.. just nudge me along ;)

(got one for you too after this, also... a coeffencient of friction.. that one I will need someone to walk me through)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Please provide the complete question when seeking help. Without having any info about "the second hill," we can't do much. One can only assume that it's peak is at a height of 15m above the horizontal track from your work. If that is so, your work is right. You may want to be a little more accurate with the final answer, though (to one or two decimal places).
 
LOL.. I thought the same thing about this question.. as with most..LOL

That was the entire question. You can see my fret over this problem..

With the decimals places I would say 10.0 instead of 10 ??

Looks good though??
 
rkslperez04 said:
LOL.. I thought the same thing about this question.. as with most..LOL

That was the entire question. You can see my fret over this problem..
So where did you get that 15 from?

With the decimals places I would say 10.0 instead of 10 ??

Looks good though??
I actually meant something like 10.2 or 10.29, which is a better approximation to sqrt(106) than 10 is.
 
ohh.. I see.. the second hill is 15m high.. i apolize for that.

Does my work look right?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K