Verify $\nabla \times \textbf{f} = 0$ and Show Non-Existence of $\psi$ on $R_2$

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter rsq_a
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Functions Potential
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on verifying that the curl of the vector field \textbf{f}(x,y,z) = (y/(x^2+y^2), -x/(x^2+y^2), 0) is zero, indicating that \textbf{f} is conservative in the region R_1 = {(x,y,z): y > 0}. The scalar field \phi = arctan(x) + arccot(x) - arctan(y/x) is identified as satisfying \textbf{f} = \nabla \phi. However, it is established that there does not exist a scalar potential function \psi such that \textbf{f} = \nabla \psi in the region R_2 = {(x,y,z): (x,y) ≠ (0,0)}, demonstrated through a contour integral around the origin yielding a non-zero result of 2π.

PREREQUISITES
  • Vector calculus, specifically understanding curl and gradient operations.
  • Knowledge of scalar fields and potential functions in multivariable calculus.
  • Familiarity with contour integrals and their implications in vector fields.
  • Understanding of polar coordinates and their application in vector analysis.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of curl and divergence in vector fields.
  • Learn about the implications of path integrals in determining the existence of potential functions.
  • Explore the concept of singularities in vector fields and their effects on conservativeness.
  • Investigate the use of polar coordinates in evaluating integrals around singular points.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and engineering students who are studying vector calculus, particularly those interested in the behavior of vector fields and potential functions in multivariable contexts.

rsq_a
Messages
103
Reaction score
1
I wasn't quite sure how to do the second part of this question:

Given [tex]\textbf{f}(x,y,z) = (y/(x^2+y^2), -x/(x^2+y^2), 0)[/tex] where [tex](x,y) \neq (0,0)[/tex], verify that [tex]\nabla \times f = 0[/tex].

(A) Find a scalar field [tex]\phi[/tex] such that [tex]\textbf{f} = \nabla \phi[/tex] on [tex]R_1 = \{(x,y,z): y > 0\}[/tex].

(B) Show that there does NOT exist [tex]\psi[/tex] such that [tex]\textbf{f} = \nabla\psi[/tex] on [tex]R_2 = \{(x,y,z): (x,y) \neq (0,0)[/tex]For (A), I found [tex]\phi =[/tex] arctan(x) + arccot(x) - arctan(y/x).

I'm not sure how to do (B). In fact, I'm not even sure why it's true.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Never mind. It's pretty easy to show just by considering a contour going around the pole (x,y) = (0, 0). Considering the path integral around r(t) = (cos t, sin t, 0), the integral gives [tex]2\pi[/tex], whereas it should give 0 if a potential function did exist.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K