Verifying S1 in Quotient Topology of R with x~x+1

  • Thread starter Thread starter andlook
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    quotient Topology
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves verifying that the real numbers R, quotiented by the equivalence relation x~x+1, is homeomorphic to the circle S^1. Participants are exploring the implications of this quotient topology and its relationship to geometric representations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss visualizing the problem through geometric representations, such as a unit square and its identification to form a cylinder or circle. There is consideration of defining a function to establish a homeomorphism between R/~ and S^1, along with questions about the mathematical rigor of these approaches.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants sharing insights and refining their understanding of the quotient topology and homeomorphism. Some have proposed specific mappings and are considering the continuity of these functions in relation to the defined topology.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of the need for a mathematically concise presentation of the ideas discussed, as well as the importance of continuity in establishing homeomorphism. Participants are also navigating the definitions of open sets in the context of the quotient topology.

andlook
Messages
32
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



verify that R, the reals, quotiented by the equivalence relation x~x+1 is S^1

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



All i can think of is to draw a unit square and identify sides like the torus, but this would be using IxI, a subset of R^2, and gives a cylinder at best... Obviously I am missing the point, so any help would be great.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok thought about this some more.

What I have done above is actually on the right path, if the horizontals of the square are identified we get a cylinder, if the vertical height is shrunk to nothing, so we are working in just R, then we get a circle. Then the result follows. I think the logic I present is correct but is there a more mathematically concise way to present this?
 
Sounds like you should try to write down a function from from R/~ into S1 (or from S1 into R/~) and then try to prove that it's a homeomorphism. You mentioned the "quotient topology" in the title. I take it that means that the open sets on R/~ are defined to be the preimages \pi^{-1}(U) of open sets U in R, where \pi:\mathbb R\rightarrow\mathbb R/\sim is the function that takes a number to its equivalence class: \pi(x)=[x].
 
Ok so the quotient R/~ = [0,1) for the relation x~x+1?

Then defining the map f:[0,1)---S^1 via

f(x)=exp(2*Pi*x*i)

for x in [0,1).

Yes I am working on the definition that open sets in the preimage are open defines continuity and so give definition of homeomorphism.

I take by showing that S^1 is homeomorphic to unit interval this shows that it has the same topology as the real line?
 
What I'm suggesting is that you define a topology on R/~ by saying that the function \pi is continuous. Then you you show that your f is continuous with respect to that that topology on R/~.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K