Verifying the Partition Function of the Quantum Harmonic Oscillator

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on verifying the partition function Z for the quantum harmonic oscillator, defined as \(\mathcal{Z}= tr(e^{-\beta H})\). The user derived Z using the power series expansion of the exponential operator and applied Schrödinger's equation, leading to the expression \(\mathcal{Z}=\frac{e^{\frac{1}{2}\beta \hbar\omega}}{e^{\beta\hbar\omega}-1}\). The user expressed concern regarding the trace argument but confirmed that both derived forms of the partition function are equivalent. The discussion emphasizes the importance of correctly applying exponential traces in quantum mechanics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles, specifically Schrödinger's equation.
  • Knowledge of partition functions in statistical mechanics.
  • Familiarity with exponential operators and power series expansions.
  • Experience with trace operations in quantum systems.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of partition functions in quantum statistical mechanics.
  • Learn about the application of exponential traces in quantum mechanics.
  • Explore the implications of the quantum harmonic oscillator in thermodynamics.
  • Investigate the mathematical properties of trace operations in quantum theory.
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, quantum mechanics students, and researchers in statistical mechanics seeking to verify and understand the partition function of quantum systems.

unchained1978
Messages
91
Reaction score
0
I've derived Z for the quantum harmonic oscillator and was wondering if anyone could verify I did everything correctly. I don't have any experience working with exponential traces so I want to make sure I'm using them correctly.
Z is defined as [itex]\mathcal{Z}= tr(e^{-\beta H})[/itex].
So the natural thing to do is write the exponential as a power series [itex]e^{-\beta H}=\sum \frac{(-\beta H)^{n}}{n!}[/itex] and using Schrödinger's equation [itex]H|\psi\rangle = E |\psi\rangle[/itex] this gives you [itex]e^{-\beta H}|\psi\rangle=\sum \frac{(-\beta E)^{n}}{n!}|\psi\rangle→tr(e^{-\beta H})=\sum_{n} e^{-\beta E_{n}}[/itex]
Writing out the energy levels this gives [itex]e^{-\frac{1}{2}\beta \hbar\omega}\sum_{n} e^{-\beta\hbar\omega n}[/itex] Which when summed over gives [itex]\mathcal{Z}=\frac{e^{\frac{1}{2}\beta \hbar\omega}}{e^{\beta\hbar\omega}-1}[/itex]
Which is the right result I think. I'm just a bit nervous about the trace argument.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I got
[tex] \frac{e^{-\frac{1}{2}\beta\hbar \omega}}{1-e^{-\beta\hbar\omega}}[/tex]
also this should be in the Quantum sub-forum, not Classical.
 
Both are equal. Multiply the numerator and denominator by [itex]e^{\beta \hbar \omega}[/itex] to get the first result from the second.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
692
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K