Verifying the Partition Function of the Quantum Harmonic Oscillator

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 5K views
unchained1978
Messages
91
Reaction score
0
I've derived Z for the quantum harmonic oscillator and was wondering if anyone could verify I did everything correctly. I don't have any experience working with exponential traces so I want to make sure I'm using them correctly.
Z is defined as [itex]\mathcal{Z}= tr(e^{-\beta H})[/itex].
So the natural thing to do is write the exponential as a power series [itex]e^{-\beta H}=\sum \frac{(-\beta H)^{n}}{n!}[/itex] and using Schrödinger's equation [itex]H|\psi\rangle = E |\psi\rangle[/itex] this gives you [itex]e^{-\beta H}|\psi\rangle=\sum \frac{(-\beta E)^{n}}{n!}|\psi\rangle→tr(e^{-\beta H})=\sum_{n} e^{-\beta E_{n}}[/itex]
Writing out the energy levels this gives [itex]e^{-\frac{1}{2}\beta \hbar\omega}\sum_{n} e^{-\beta\hbar\omega n}[/itex] Which when summed over gives [itex]\mathcal{Z}=\frac{e^{\frac{1}{2}\beta \hbar\omega}}{e^{\beta\hbar\omega}-1}[/itex]
Which is the right result I think. I'm just a bit nervous about the trace argument.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I got
[tex] \frac{e^{-\frac{1}{2}\beta\hbar \omega}}{1-e^{-\beta\hbar\omega}}[/tex]
also this should be in the Quantum sub-forum, not Classical.
 
Both are equal. Multiply the numerator and denominator by [itex]e^{\beta \hbar \omega}[/itex] to get the first result from the second.