Minimize grand potential functional for density matrix

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on minimizing the grand potential functional for a density matrix, defined as $$\Omega[\hat \rho] = \text{Tr} \hat \rho \left[ \hat H - \mu \hat N + \frac 1 {\beta} \log \hat \rho \right]$$. The conclusion is that this minimization leads to the expression $$\Omega[\hat \rho_0] = - \frac 1 {\beta} \log \text{Tr} e^{-\beta (\hat H - \mu \hat N )}$$. The proof involves defining the operator $$\rho_{\lambda} = \frac {e^{H-\mu N + \lambda \Delta}} {\text{Tr}e^{H-\mu N + \lambda \Delta}}$$ and demonstrating that the functional is minimized at the equilibrium state $$\rho_0$$. The original proof by von Neumann is referenced, along with Mermin's introduction of the functional in PhysRev.137.A1441.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum statistical mechanics
  • Familiarity with operator notation in quantum mechanics
  • Knowledge of the grand canonical ensemble
  • Experience with functional minimization techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the grand potential in quantum statistical mechanics
  • Learn about the properties of density matrices in quantum mechanics
  • Investigate the implications of Mermin's work in PhysRev.137.A1441
  • Explore advanced topics in functional analysis related to quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Researchers in quantum mechanics, physicists studying statistical mechanics, and graduate students focusing on quantum theory and functional analysis will benefit from this discussion.

dRic2
Gold Member
Messages
887
Reaction score
225
TL;DR
##\rho## is the density matrix
##\Omega## is the grand potential
##\text{Tr}## stands for 'trace'
I'd like to show that, by minimizing this functional
$$\Omega[\hat \rho] = \text{Tr} \hat \rho \left[ \hat H - \mu \hat N + \frac 1 {\beta} \log \hat \rho \right]$$
I get the well known expression
$$\Omega[\hat \rho_0] = - \frac 1 {\beta} \log \text{Tr} e^{-\beta (\hat H - \mu \hat N )}$$

I'm familiar with minimizing a functional of the form ##F[g] = \int dx f(g(x))##, but this notations for operators eludes me.

Thanks,
Ric
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I've found the original paper (PhysRev.137.A1441) where Mermin introduced this functional. You can check the proof in the Appendix (If I'm not mistaken it was first proved by von Neumann).

To sum up the idea behind the proof is to define the operator ##\rho_{\lambda} = \frac {e^{H-\mu N + \lambda \Delta}} {\text{Tr}e^{H-\mu N + \lambda \Delta}}## with ##\Delta = -H + \mu N - \frac 1 {\beta} \log \rho##. You can see that because of ##\text{Tr} \rho =1## for ##\lambda = 1## I get ##\rho_1 = \rho## and for ##\lambda = 0## you get ##\rho = \rho_0## (the equilibrium value). You can then proceed to study the following relation ##\Omega[\rho] - \Omega[\rho_0] = \Omega[\rho_{\lambda = 1}] - \Omega[\rho_{\lambda = 0}] = \int_0^1 \frac {\partial \Omega[\rho_{\lambda}]} {\partial \lambda} d \lambda## and check that is always greater than zero and zero only if ##\lambda = 0## thus proving that ##\rho_0## minimizes the functional
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K