Very Simple = a negatively charged rod will only attract what?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the behavior of a negatively charged rod and its interaction with various objects, specifically focusing on the nature of the objects it attracts. The context includes historical perspectives on electrostatics, referencing Isaac Newton's explanation of electrical forces.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore whether a negatively charged rod attracts only positively charged objects or if neutral objects can also be attracted due to polarization effects. There is a focus on confirming the understanding of electrostatic principles.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with some participants seeking confirmation of their understanding while others provide insights into the nature of attraction, particularly regarding the role of neutral objects and polarization. There is a lack of explicit consensus on the nature of the attracted objects.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating between historical explanations and modern understandings of electrostatic forces, indicating a potential gap in clarity regarding the definitions and assumptions related to charged and neutral objects.

daNAV1GATOR
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
I'm having a hard time about a negatively charged rod and the objects it will attract.

It's true that the rod will only attract positively charged objects, correct?




here's what I have to answer in my exam.
To explain the attraction which a rubbed rod of amber exerted on small objects which were some distance away from it, Isaac Newton suggested that there was an invisble substance in the amber which he called an "electrical spirit." When the rod was rubbed, this electrical spirit was disturbed and stretched out into the area around the rod. When the electrical spirit contracted again, it pulled with it any small objects that happened to be in its path.

PROBLEM: WHAT EXPLANATION IS USED TODAY TO EXPLAIN HOW ELECTRICAL FORCES ARE ABLE TO ACT UPON OBJECTS AT A DISTANCE?


I understand electrostatics... but the question is kinda hard for me to explain. hehe =)

What I would like to confirm is... The small objects in Isaac Newton's experiment that were attracted to the rod were postively charged?? -- and not neutral?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What I would like to confirm is... The small objects in Isaac Newton's experiment that were attracted to the rod were positively charged?? -- and not neutral?
 
please somebody help...

Doc Al?
 
is my question too hard...

or is it too easy...? =)


Just need someone to please confirm my understanding.. THANKS!
 
They were most likely neutral. The charge of the rod polarized them, moving the positive charges in them more towards the rod, and the negative charges away from the rod. The result is that the rod will attract them
 
Thanks!
 

Similar threads

Metal sphere drawn and then repelled by charged rod
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
Experiment of water defection with a charged rod
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
Electric field acting on a negative test charge due to semicircular rod
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
How Do You Calculate the Electric Field of a Nonuniformly Charged Rod?
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
11K
Point charge with very thin metal sheet along a spherical surface
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
Charged Teflon Rod & Aluminum (Conductor vs Insulator type question)
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
14K
Kinetic and potential energy of a particle attracted by charged sphere
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Identical objects carry a net charge
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
High School Problems I Have With Electrostatics and Pith Ball Experiments
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
Uncharged object between two charged plates
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K