Very simple double slit question.

  • Thread starter Thread starter linuxux
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Double slit Slit
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the slit separation in a double-slit experiment using 500 nm light. The distance from the first to the tenth nodal line is given as 5.0 cm, with the screen located 3.0 m away from the slits. The correct order of the tenth nodal line is identified as 9, not 10, due to the central fringe being the zeroth order. The relevant equation for determining the slit separation is derived from the double-slit interference formula.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of wave-particle duality in physics
  • Familiarity with the double-slit experiment
  • Knowledge of interference patterns and fringe orders
  • Basic algebra for manipulating equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the double-slit interference formula for calculating slit separation
  • Learn about fringe spacing in interference patterns
  • Explore the implications of wavelength on interference patterns
  • Investigate the effects of slit width on diffraction and interference
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, educators teaching wave optics, and anyone interested in experimental physics and interference phenomena.

linuxux
Messages
133
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


500 nm light passes through 2 slits. Nodal lines are produced 3.0 m away. the distance from the 1st to 10th nodal line is 5.0cm. what is the slit separation?

Homework Equations



What equation do i use here?

is it this:

http://www.studyphysics.ca/20/unit4/wavemodel/doubleslit/note_files/image015.gif

l = wavelength of light used (m) = 5 x 10^-7

x = distance from central fringe (m) = .05m

d = distance between the slits (m) = ?

n = the order of the fringe = 10

L = length from the screen with slits to the viewing screen (m) = 3.0m
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Correct, except I think that the "order" should be 9. The first line forms with no difference at all, so its order is 0, and the "order" of the 10th line is therefore 9.
 
thanks, that's the part i was confused about.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
10K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
11K