Virtual particles colliding with other virtual particles

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the interactions of virtual particles, specifically their collisions and the potential transfer of energy to the real world. Participants confirm that while virtual particles can collide, they adhere to the laws of conservation of energy and momentum. The conversation highlights the significance of virtual particles in high-energy physics experiments, such as those conducted at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), where virtual b quarks produce detectable b jets. Additionally, the discussion references the Higgs boson production modes, including gluon fusion and vector boson fusion, as examples of virtual particle interactions leading to real particle generation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum field theory
  • Familiarity with the concepts of virtual particles and their properties
  • Knowledge of conservation laws in physics
  • Basic principles of high-energy particle physics, particularly related to the LHC
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the role of virtual particles in quantum field theory
  • Study the Higgs boson production mechanisms, focusing on gluon fusion and vector boson fusion
  • Explore experimental evidence of virtual particles, particularly in high-energy physics contexts
  • Investigate statistical methods for estimating virtual particle collision rates and outcomes
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, researchers in quantum mechanics, and students of high-energy particle physics will benefit from this discussion, particularly those interested in the implications of virtual particles in experimental settings.

josephwouk
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
Forgive that to many here this will sound like a dumb question. I have searched and searched and failed to find an answer.

Give the constant creation/annihilation of all forms of particles in ZPE, it seems likely to me that some among them would collide with each other before either had a chance to annihilate. When such collision occurs, does any energy get transferred to the "real" world and not get annihilated?

Has any calculation ever been made as to how often such collisions are likely to occur?

Thanks for your help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That virtual particles exist at all, except as far as their virtualness is perhaps an artifact of calculation or something, is/has been a hotly debated topic in physics forums. The 'evidence' of the widely referenced, including by some highly-credentialed physics boffins, Casimir effect has been interpreted otherwise:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casimir_effect

Therefore, before speculating on the interactions of virtual particles, we must establish whether they necessarily exist. Or else the discussion becomes crudely analogous to what happens every time a flying saucer collides with Santa Claus.
 
Dan...

Thank you for your response. I am familiar with your point of view on virtual particles. There is another view however, that regards them as particles in all regards for the short time they exist.

It is to these people that my question should have been specifically addressed.
 
josephwouk said:
Dan...

Thank you for your response. I am familiar with your point of view on virtual particles. There is another view however, that regards them as particles in all regards for the short time they exist.

It is to these people that my question should have been specifically addressed.

Very well, and I have nothing further to add, except my concern for those who, as I once did, are eager to join in a discussion about things only because they are so blithely discussed in popular magazines, treated as a given on the same level as c-invariance, evolution, and the like; and the less parsimonious view has perversely risen to the top of legitimacy.
 
josephwouk, Your understanding of virtual particles as real particles that exist only a brief time is correct, and is the majority point of view.

In answer to your question, while virtual particle can interact with each other, the laws of conservation of energy and momentum are obeyed at every vertex. If the state in question is the vacuum state, the amount of energy available is zero, and consequently any particles that are created will be virtual.

On the other hand in a collision additional energy is available, and interactions between virtual particles can lead to additional particles in the final state.

As an example, among the leading production modes expected for Higgs bosons are gluon fusion and vector boson fusion. Here, two quarks (which themselves are virtual) produce a pair of virtual bosons (such as W or Z) which then collide to form a Higgs boson. The Higgs (also virtual!) decays, perhaps into a pair of photons, or by other modes into leptons.
 
Maybe of interest: Virtual particle pair production in the vacuum, photon scattering, Unruh radiation, Schwinger effect ("virtual electron-positron pairs will be able to separate and become real") etc will be experimentally investigated by the (European) Extreme Light Infrastructure project in the next few years http://www.extreme-light-infrastructure.eu/High-field_5_2.php
 
danR said:
That virtual particles exist at all, except as far as their virtualness is perhaps an artifact of calculation or something, is/has been a hotly debated topic in physics forums. The 'evidence' of the widely referenced, including by some highly-credentialed physics boffins, Casimir effect has been interpreted otherwise:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casimir_effect

Therefore, before speculating on the interactions of virtual particles, we must establish whether they necessarily exist. Or else the discussion becomes crudely analogous to what happens every time a flying saucer collides with Santa Claus.

I've said this before in another post. You can scatter of virtual b quarks in the proton during high energy physics experiments (like at the LHC), which produce b jets. These b jets will leave a unique signature in your detector. So from an experimentalist point of view, virtual particles do exists, and you can measure the consequences of their existence. They are not a mere calculation tool. Also, all "real" particles are slightly off shell, and eventually end their existence at a vertex of another interaction, so they are in essence virtual as well. What is a mere calculation tool and an idealization is the idea of a free particle, since by definition they ever interact, and hence can never be studied or detected.
 
Bill_K said:
josephwouk, Your understanding of virtual particles as real particles that exist only a brief time is correct, and is the majority point of view.

In answer to your question, while virtual particle can interact with each other, the laws of conservation of energy and momentum are obeyed at every vertex. If the state in question is the vacuum state, the amount of energy available is zero, and consequently any particles that are created will be virtual.

On the other hand in a collision additional energy is available, and interactions between virtual particles can lead to additional particles in the final state.

As an example, among the leading production modes expected for Higgs bosons are gluon fusion and vector boson fusion. Here, two quarks (which themselves are virtual) produce a pair of virtual bosons (such as W or Z) which then collide to form a Higgs boson. The Higgs (also virtual!) decays, perhaps into a pair of photons, or by other modes into leptons.


Thank you for your reply. It is precisely these "additional particles" that I'm referring to.

Assuming that they indeed survive, I was wondering whether any statistical calculation has been or even can be made to estimate how often virtual particles collide and produce additional particles.

My guess/hope is that it would only be a tiny percentage.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
6K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K