Biosyn
- 114
- 0
Flatland said:Perhaps we need a new classification that exists between life and non-life?
Gene Creatures
Flatland said:Perhaps we need a new classification that exists between life and non-life?
It's more a case of we don't have a definition that can adequately deal with viruses rather than us not having enough facts about them.Amiri Daudi said:There some facts which shows that they are living and some facts that they are non-living.
Vaccines are not the only measure and for some diseases there is no vaccine but there are treatments (like interferon or anti-retrovirals). I'm not sure what you mean by difficult to treat as I am unsure what you are comparing it to.Amiri Daudi said:This is the reason why diseases cause by viruses are difficult to treat the only remedial measure is using the vaccines.
You can also put the component parts of viruses into a vial and they self assemble, in that respect they are complex biological nanoparticles capable of self assembly.Amiri Daudi said:The viruses replicate in this respect this is one characteristic of a living thing that of reproduction.On the other hand viruses can be crystalised and kept in a bottle and close even for 300yrs but when release and found their substrate organ they start to replicate again this charactiristic is not in living organisms.Viruses do not respire,digest or excrete as living organisms do.