Visible Light Reflection from Oil-Water Interface in Parking Lot

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the reflection of visible light from an oil-water interface, specifically focusing on the conditions for constructive interference based on the thickness of the oil layer and the refractive indices of oil and water.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the setup of the problem, particularly how to apply the formula for constructive interference. There is confusion regarding the roles of thickness and wavelength, and how to correctly identify the values for calculations.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, questioning the setup and clarifying the relationships between the variables involved. Some guidance has been offered regarding the calculation of wavelengths and the significance of the integer m in the context of visible light.

Contextual Notes

There is an emphasis on the need to focus on wavelengths within the visible spectrum (400nm to 700nm) and the understanding that the oil thickness is critical to determining which wavelengths will reflect strongly.

truckerron1
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
A tiny layer of oil (n = 1.25) is situated on top of a water puddle (n = 1.33) in a parking lot. If the thickness of the oil is 242 nm, the what color(s) of visible light will give a strong reflection?

2t=m*lambda/n2

2t=242nm/1.25 and then 2t=242nm/1.33
i just don't know what goes where on this problem please help thanks ron
 
Physics news on Phys.org
242 nm is the thickness of the oil (t), not the wavelength of the light (lambda).
 
so how do i set it up if t=242
 
so would it be
2(242)=m*1.25/1.33
 
No, NONE of the light that gets reflected travels through the water.
The extra path length (which is responsible for the constructive interference)
travels down thru the OIL and back up thru the OIL.
You should expect the OIL thickness to be associated with the OIL index.

You're trying to SOLVE for lambda ...
 
Last edited:
In addition to lightgrav's useful comment, I'll add that at this point you may be wondering what to use for m?

Each integer value of m (1, 2, 3, ...) gives a possible wavelength, in principle. However, you specifically need only the wavelengths that are visible, that is, in the range 400nm to 700nm. So start with m = 1 and calculate lambda for each value of m in turn. It will be pretty obvious when you can safely stop (i.e. after you've gone through the entire visible range).
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
8K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
8K
Replies
3
Views
7K