MHB Visual proof of if ∞=1/0, then 0=1/∞

  • Thread starter Thread starter anemone
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof Visual
AI Thread Summary
The discussion presents a visual proof asserting that if ∞ equals 1/0, then 0 must equal 1/∞. The proof involves rotating the equation counterclockwise by 90 degrees, leading to the equation 8 = -10. After manipulating the equation by subtracting 8, it concludes that 0 equals -18. The proof is then reversed to demonstrate that 0 indeed equals 1/∞. This approach humorously addresses the question of what was divided to reach such conclusions.
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
A visual proof of the following statement:

If $\infty=\dfrac{1}{0}$, then $0=\dfrac{1}{\infty}$ .

Proof:

Assume $\infty=\dfrac{1}{0}$. Rotate each side of the equation counterclockwise $90^{\circ}$. We get 8 = −10. Subtract 8, getting 0 = −18. Then rotate both parts back: $0=\dfrac{1}{\infty}$. QED.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
anemone said:
A visual proof of the following statement:

If $\infty=\dfrac{1}{0}$, then $0=\dfrac{1}{\infty}$ .

Proof:

Assume $\infty=\dfrac{1}{0}$. Rotate each side of the equation counterclockwise $90^{\circ}$. We get 8 = −10. Subtract 8, getting 0 = −18. Then rotate both parts back: $0=\dfrac{1}{\infty}$. QED.
I think this proof answers the question: "What did you divide by this time??"

-Dan
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Back
Top