Visualizing 3D Contours of Spacetime

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Easton Morrill
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Spacetime
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on visualizing spacetime, particularly in relation to black holes and the limitations of traditional two-dimensional representations. Participants emphasize the importance of understanding Minkowski diagrams, which are essential for grasping special relativity before tackling general relativity and curved spacetime. The "rubber sheet" analogy is criticized for being misleading, and Flamm's Paraboloid is recommended as a more accurate visualization tool. Overall, the conversation highlights the need for clarity in representing complex concepts in physics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Minkowski diagrams for special relativity
  • Basic knowledge of general relativity concepts
  • Familiarity with black hole properties and their effects on spacetime
  • Ability to interpret graphical representations of physical theories
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "Minkowski diagrams" to enhance understanding of special relativity
  • Explore "Flamm's Paraboloid" for a better visualization of spacetime around black holes
  • Study the implications of curved spacetime in general relativity
  • Investigate alternative visualization techniques for complex physical concepts
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators explaining relativity, and anyone interested in the visualization of complex spacetime concepts, particularly in relation to black holes.

Easton Morrill
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
In every video and educational movie that I've seen, it shows Einstein's vision of Spacetime on an XYZ graph with a fourth dimensional time, but my confusion arises because the videos then put this graph on a two dimensional plane of "Spacetime." My question concerns the visualization of this, I am confused whether one should visualize this in three dimensions, and if so, how do black holes and them tearing a hole in spacetime, rip? I mean to say one always visualizes it on a plane with a singularity stretching downward to infinity, but how would I look at this in three dimensions?
Thank you to everyone/anyone who responds, I'm sure that your comment will be very helpful.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
All of those "rubber sheet" analogies are poor analogies at best. There is no such thing as the "fabric of space" (or spacetime for that matter). Personally, I've never figured out how to visualize spacetime near a black hole (although I think I've sort of got it) I just concentrate on the properties which is really what matters.
 
Easton Morrill said:
my confusion arises because the videos then put this graph on a two dimensional plane of "Spacetime."
That could be either of two things. If all the objects involved in the problem lie on a straight line in space (Einstein's classic thought experiments often involved trains and observers along straight railroad tracks for that reason) we only need to draw two dimensions: one for space and one for time, and that's easy to draw on a sheet of graph paper. These diagrams are usually called "Minkowski diagrams" or "space-time diagrams", and they are an essential tools for learning, visualizing, and understanding special relativity. You do not want to take on general relativity and curved spacetime until you are comfortable with reading and interpreting them.

The second common thing you will see is an attempt to explain gravity by showing an illustration of a flat horizontal surface deformed downwards into a funnel shape by the mass at the center. In these pictures, the two dimensions of the sheet are space dimensions and the third dimension through which the sheet is deformed has no physical significance - the artist just needed it to draw the deformation. This is the "rubber sheet" analogy that Phinds disparages above, and he's right - it is very misleading and you might be better off trying to forget that you've ever seen it.

You can find a much more accurate and informative picture by googling for "Flamm's Paraboloid". But as I said, you'll wantbto be comfortable with the two-dimensional Minkowski spacetime diagrams first.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: stoomart

Similar threads

  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 63 ·
3
Replies
63
Views
8K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
6K