Evo
- 24,114
- 3,277
Blond? I'm sure you posted a picture years ago of you in Hawaii and you had dark hair.Tsu said:Oh good. It's super small.Sorry. Can't fix it.
Blond? I'm sure you posted a picture years ago of you in Hawaii and you had dark hair.Tsu said:Oh good. It's super small.Sorry. Can't fix it.
I once stood in the queue of the mensa and in front of me was a girl in a short skirt and with beautiful legs. As I dreamt a little by myself she all of a sudden turned around... "Hi, Christine!Psinter said:A girl once got angry at me at uni because I did not remember her. She called me by my name, but I could not recognize her. I told her: "If you know my name I suppose I know you from somewhere, right?" I think I shouldn't have said that, she looked like I offended one of her great ancestors.
Box of hair color.Evo said:Blond? I'm sure you posted a picture years ago of you in Hawaii and you had dark hair.

That and a pair of 1980's sunglasses and you can be anyone you want!Tsu said:Box of hair color.![]()

It sounds like you may possibly have prosopagnosia:Sophia said:I'm terrible at remembering faces! It's so embarrassing. Than it seems like I'm so rude when I don't greet people.
I admire our HS teacher. He only asked each of 23 students their name once and immediately remembered them all.
I'm quite good at remembering voices. I always remember it and sometimes when someone greets me I recognize them by their voice instead of face :) But obviously, they have to greet me first![]()
It's possible that I have a light form of this disorder. It's not that I don't recognize faces at all, but it seems that I need a lot more (compared to what seems normal) encounters with a person before I can recognize them in different situation and/ or clothing.zoobyshoe said:It sounds like you may possibly have prosopagnosia:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prosopagnosia
Tests for this exist. I don't know if it would be worth it for you to get tested except that it might exonerate you from accusations of being inattentive.
Maybe like me, your brain is full. To remember a new face, you will have to forget an old one.Sophia said:It's possible that I have a light form of this disorder. It's not that I don't recognize faces at all, but it seems that I need a lot more (compared to what seems normal) encounters with a person before I can recognize them in different situation and/ or clothing.

wolram said:Crazy ninja, you have to have seen the advert to know why
![]()

Evo said:I have it. I hate this new forum software, you can't attach an image, it has to be hosted somewhere else.
![]()
Evo said:I guess you can teach an old mule new tricks. Here's me . https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/96050
newjerseyrunner said:I picture people based on their avatar and name.
Oh...uhm...ODiracPool said:Using an advanced search algorithm, I was able to locate a picture of OmCheeto...
![]()
Wow! with such skills, I'm sure you work for FBI or CIA1oldman2 said:View attachment 96235 Using D.P.'s advanced search algorithm (and my snipping tool) I was able to come up with an image of Silicon waffle![]()

It's my processor speed, can't get around that one little bottleneckSilicon Waffle said:Come on, already 155. Your information is out-dated!(@ 10:59 AM Texas grandfather clock )
They both "let me go" for humor related issues, I'm a free agent at the moment honing my skills as an unskilled skill seekerSophia said:Wow! with such skills, I'm sure you work for FBI or CIA![]()
unskilled=[itex]\bar{P}[/itex]1oldman2 said:... an unskilled skill seeker![]()
That could almost be the basis for an entirely new thread.Silicon Waffle said:unskilled=[itex]\bar{P}[/itex]
skill=[itex]{P}[/itex]
seeker=[itex]{S}[/itex]
So, [itex]{S}[/itex] is part of [itex]{P}[/itex] which is negated by [itex]\bar{P}[/itex] or [itex]{SP}[/itex] is negated by [itex]\bar{P}[/itex]. That means [itex]\bar{P}[/itex] turns down [itex]{S}[/itex].
But then its components would have to be independent, and span the whole thread.1oldman2 said:That could almost be the basis for an entirely new thread.![]()
I will try and get Mr. S. Waffle on that one as my problem solving skills need to have some problems solved themselves.mfb said:But then its components would have to be independent, and span the whole thread.
Wha..wa.. What?Silicon Waffle said:unskilled=[itex]\bar{P}[/itex]
skill=[itex]{P}[/itex]
seeker=[itex]{S}[/itex]
So, [itex]{S}[/itex] is part of [itex]{P}[/itex] which is negated by [itex]\bar{P}[/itex] or [itex]{SP}[/itex] is negated by [itex]\bar{P}[/itex]. That means [itex]\bar{P}[/itex] turns down [itex]{S}[/itex].
CrazyNinja I'm glad you don't understand either :) I thought I was the only one too stupid to understand a science/math/logic jokeCrazyNinja said:Wha..wa.. What?

Um, no. That's not Kim Kardashian.CrazyNinja said:You visualise Sophia as Kim Kardashian?
PS: Did you recognise who it is?
Enlighten me, please.Psinter said:Is it someone famous?