Voltage - Sign convention problems

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion clarifies the concept of voltage and electric fields, particularly in relation to oppositely charged plates. It establishes that voltage is a relative measure, dependent on the chosen reference point, and can be positive or negative without changing the charge distribution. The electric field direction is defined by its effect on positive test charges, with voltage decreasing along the field lines. Understanding these principles is crucial for interpreting electric potential energy in various contexts.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric fields and their behavior
  • Familiarity with voltage as a relative concept
  • Knowledge of charge distributions and their effects
  • Basic grasp of electric potential energy
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the relationship between electric fields and voltage using Maxwell's equations
  • Learn about the concept of electric potential and equipotential surfaces
  • Explore the implications of charge movement in circuits and electric fields
  • Investigate the differences between conventional current and electron flow
USEFUL FOR

Students preparing for exams in physics, electrical engineers, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of electric fields and voltage concepts.

Rib5
Messages
59
Reaction score
0
Hey guys, I need some help clearing up voltage signs, its always confusing me and I have my final this Friday.

First off I'm not talking about voltage in a circuit, but rather if there is an electric field caused by a charge distribution.

First off, I understand potential energy for gravity. ANYTHING with a higher height is considered to have a higher potential energy. But with voltage you can have + and - charges. So my confusion is if you have an electric field caused by two oppositely charged plates---------------->
(+) ------------> (-)
---------------->

1) Which side has higher potential energy? The + or the - side.

2) So say the potential is 500V, and the book says, now assume the V is -500, how is it possible to have a different potential without switching the charges around?I don't know how to really put this in words but if you can figure out what I am confused about then I would appreciate some explanation.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Voltage is a strictly relative concept. You cannot simply say "this point has a voltage of 500V." You must also provide some point of reference which you are using to judge the voltage. For example, you could say "this point has a voltage 500V higher than the other point."

The electric field is conventionally described by its effects on a positive test charge. Therefore, electric field lines point away from positive charges and towards negative charges. Since voltage is the line integral of those field lines, voltage decreases as you walk along a field line.

In the picture you've drawn, you are free to label either side of the diagram as having a potential of 0V. If you declare that the left hand side has a potential of 0V, then the right hand side has a potential of -500V. If you declare that the right hand side has a potential of 0V, then the left hand side has a potential of +500V.

- Warren
 
Rib5 said:
So my confusion is if you have an electric field caused by two oppositely charged plates


---------------->
(+) ------------> (-)
---------------->

1) Which side has higher potential energy? The + or the - side.

depends on if you're a positively charged object or particle or a negatively charged one. if you're positively charged, you have more potential energy if you are close to the + side. if you're a negatively charged particle, you have more potential energy when you're close to the - side.

2) So say the potential is 500V, and the book says, now assume the V is -500, how is it possible to have a different potential without switching the charges around?

i think that's what happens when you change the voltage of something (relative to the same whatever point of reference): charge moves around.
 
To avoid confusing the issue, rbj, remember that it's conventional to consider positive test charges. If you use a positive test charge, it will experience force in the same direction as the electric field line it's on. That makes it all pretty easy to remember.

- Warren
 
chroot said:
To avoid confusing the issue, rbj, remember that it's conventional to consider positive test charges. If you use a positive test charge, it will experience force in the same direction as the electric field line it's on. That makes it all pretty easy to remember.

oh, all right.

i still think your avatar is just tits, Warren. that has to be the coolest looking, clearest and most symmetrical nebula around.
 
its sort of convention i think... electrons are electricity... and electrons are stored at the negative polarity node... hence in one sense you could say that the negative side is higher potential. however in the words of my high school teacher, we are used to things flowing from positive to negative.. high to low. hence the direction of conventional current is from positive to negative... but the direction of flow of electrons is from negative to positive.
 
tenseiga,

It is absolutely just a convention; however, it's important to follow the convention if you wish for anyone else to understand you.

By the way, electrons are not "stored at" the negative terminal of a battery; the battery pushes them in that terminal's direction when current is able to flow, but they're not piled up there by the millions, waiting to be used.

Don't confuse voltages with concentration of electrons -- they are two entirely different concepts. You can still have a voltage across a wire, even if the electron concentration is the same everywhere in that wire (this is the usual case).

- Warren
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K