Is the Configuration of Magnetic Fields Only a Convention?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the conceptualization of magnetic fields, questioning whether their configuration is merely a convention. Participants reference historical figures such as Faraday and Ampere, noting that Faraday's field theory contrasts with Ampere's force-based perspective. The discussion highlights that the direction of magnetic fields can be altered by changing conventions, such as the right-hand rule or the sign in Maxwell's equations. Ultimately, it concludes that while the configuration of magnetic fields may appear conventional, it is rooted in the fundamental physics of electromagnetic interactions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electromagnetic theory, specifically Maxwell's equations.
  • Familiarity with historical perspectives on magnetism, particularly the views of Faraday and Ampere.
  • Knowledge of vector calculus, particularly the curl operator and vector potentials.
  • Concept of gauge transformations in electromagnetism.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of gauge transformations in electromagnetic theory.
  • Explore the historical context of Faraday's and Ampere's theories on magnetism.
  • Study the mathematical formulation of magnetic vector potential and its applications.
  • Investigate the practical effects of changing conventions in electromagnetic field configurations.
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, electrical engineers, and students of electromagnetism seeking a deeper understanding of the conceptual foundations of magnetic fields and their historical development.

  • #61
Ibix said:
In addition to @weirdoguy's point, then, how do you define this field when two or three particles pass through the same point with different velocities? Your field has different strengths and directions from the same source at the same point.

Thank you.
Good point, I didn't think of that.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
13K
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
4K