Question about the polarity of a voltage (PHY 2 for engineers)

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mhrob24
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Polarity Voltage
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of voltage polarity, particularly in the context of batteries and the movement of charges. Participants explore the relationship between voltage, potential energy, and the direction of charge flow, addressing both theoretical and practical implications.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the textbook's assertion that batteries move negative charges from the negative terminal to the positive terminal, arguing that this contradicts the principles of Coulomb's law regarding repulsion and potential energy.
  • Another participant clarifies that voltage is defined as the change of potential, not directly the change of potential energy, and explains how this relates to the movement of charges.
  • Some participants highlight the confusion surrounding the direction of current flow, noting that conventional current flows from positive to negative, which is opposite to the flow of electrons.
  • A later reply discusses the distinction between electric fields associated with electromotive force (EMF) and electrostatic fields, suggesting that understanding these concepts requires knowledge of both physics and chemistry.
  • One participant acknowledges a misunderstanding of their textbook and elaborates on the concept of potential difference, suggesting that the definition of the origin point affects the perceived polarity of voltage.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the interpretation of voltage and charge movement, with some agreeing on the need for clarity regarding definitions and conventions, while others maintain differing perspectives on the implications of these concepts.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved assumptions regarding the definitions of voltage and potential energy, as well as the implications of charge movement in circuits. The discussion also reflects confusion stemming from historical conventions in electrical terminology.

mhrob24
Messages
53
Reaction score
9
My problem is understanding how the polarity of a voltage makes sense. For example, In my textbook, its states that "batteries move negative charges from its negative terminal to its positive terminal. In terms of potential, the positive terminal is at a HIGHER voltage than the negative terminal". Now, reading that just doesn't make any sense to me, and ill now explain my rationale:

If batteries move negative charges from a NEGATIVE terminal, then considering how Coulomb's law works; this means that the field from the negative terminal will produce a REPULSION force onto the negative charge (like signs repel). In terms of potential energy of the negative charge, this means that the negative charges being repelled from the negative terminal are GAINING kinetic energy and LOSING potential energy (If I manually took a negative charge being repelled by the negative terminal and moved it TOWARD the negative terminal, its would GAIN potential energy).

So with this logic in mind, as the negative charges are repelled toward the positive terminal...then the negative charge being moved by the battery has LOST potential energy as it moves from its negative terminal to its positive terminal. If voltage is the change of potential energy, how the hell is the voltage at the positive terminal HIGHER than the negative terminal if the negative charge underwent a NEGATIVE change in potential energy as it traveled from its negative terminal to its positive terminal?

That seems backwards to me but I'm not the brightest bulb in the box so maybe I'm overthinking this and confusing myself somewhere, but I have read that the topic of voltage is one that tends to be quite confusing.

Thanks in advance to anyone who helps!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
mhrob24 said:
If voltage is the change of potential energy, how the hell is the voltage at the positive terminal HIGHER than the negative terminal if the negative charge underwent a NEGATIVE change in potential energy as it traveled from its negative terminal to its positive terminal?
Voltage (V) is the change of potential, not the change of potential energy. The change of potential energy is the voltage times the charge (QV).

So going from the negative terminal to the positive terminal V is positive, and for a negative charge Q is negative so the change in potential energy QV is negative.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mhrob24
mhrob24 said:
"batteries move negative charges from its negative terminal to its positive terminal.
If it really says that, it's wrong. A battery can cause current to flow from the positive to the negative terminal through an external circuit. A positive current is opposite to the direction of the flow of electrons. Double check your book. Is it talking about charges inside the battery or charges in the external circuit? (If you want to know who to blame for that horrible sign convention, it was Benjamin Franklin. A millenium from now, people will still be confused by that.)

But to understand a battery well, takes more than charges. It takes a little chemistry. Try this article, and see if it helps.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrochemistry
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mhrob24
We have encountered that problem a couple of times, and it is necessary to distinguish between an electric field that is part of an EMF,( oftentimes written as ## E_{induced} ##, but it can also be part of a chemical potential in a battery), and an electrostatic electric field. ## \\ ## For the EMF, the voltage at B, (calling point A as zero voltage), is ## V_B=\int\limits_{A}^{B} E_{induced} \cdot dl ##. ## \\ ## For the electrostatic electric field, ## V_B=-\int\limits_{A}^{B} E_{electrostatic} \cdot dl ##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mhrob24
anorlunda said:
If it really says that, it's wrong. A battery can cause current to flow from the positive to the negative terminal through an external circuit. A positive current is opposite to the direction of the flow of electrons. Double check your book. Is it talking about charges inside the battery or charges in the external circuit? (If you want to know who to blame for that horrible sign convention, it was Benjamin Franklin. A millenium from now, people will still be confused by that.)

But to understand a battery well, takes more than charges. It takes a little chemistry. Try this article, and see if it helps.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrochemistry
You are correct. I did not accurately quote my textbook. This was the case of a CIRCUIT connected to a battery moving a NEGATIVE charge from its negative terminal to its positive terminal (the circuit was a headlamp). So, if I truly do understand this time, the voltage is the potential difference of a charge moved from A to B DIVIDED by the charge (V = change in U/Q) Hence, independent of the charge, aka only dependent on the DIFFERENCE.

So really, the polarity of the voltage is just a matter of where you choose your origin (start point) to be. So in the example of a battery moving a charge in a circuit from its negative terminal to its positive terminal, the potential DIFFERENCE is positive because we defined our origin (start point) to be the negative terminal. So as the negative charge moves to the positive terminal, there is a positive DIFFERENCE (like going from 0 to 10). The only way for the Voltage in this case to be NEGATIVE is if the flow of the negative charges from the negative to the positive terminal is reversed. This would mean that our negative charge would be moving closer toward our origin point (the negative terminal). So like, going from 0 to 3 instead of 0 to 10. There is LESS of a DIFFERENCE from 0 going to 3 than there is from 0 to 10, so that would be a NEGATIVE potential difference aka a negative voltage...?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
7K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K