Calculating Volume with Volumes of Revolution: Triangle Rotated about x = -2

  • Thread starter Thread starter Panphobia
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Revolution Volumes
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the volume of a triangle bounded by the equations y = 0, y = x, and y = 2 - x, when rotated about the line x = -2. The user initially attempted to set up the volume calculation using vertical rectangles, resulting in two integrals: 2π∫(0 to 1)(x + 2)(x)dx and 2π∫(1 to 2)(x + 2)(2 - x)dx. However, the user encountered errors in evaluating the integrals and misidentified the boundaries, leading to incorrect results. After clarification, it was established that the integrals were correctly set up, but the user had made mistakes in the evaluation process.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of calculus concepts, specifically volumes of revolution
  • Familiarity with integral calculus and the shell method
  • Knowledge of the equations of lines and triangles in Cartesian coordinates
  • Ability to visualize geometric shapes and their rotations
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the shell method for calculating volumes of revolution
  • Practice setting up integrals for different geometric shapes rotated about various axes
  • Learn about common mistakes in evaluating definite integrals
  • Explore graphical tools for visualizing volumes of revolution
USEFUL FOR

Students studying calculus, particularly those focusing on volumes of revolution, as well as educators looking for examples of common pitfalls in integral evaluation.

Panphobia
Messages
435
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement



Calculate the volume obtained by rotating the triangle bounded by y = 0, y = x, and y = 2 - x, about the line x = -2. You may use either horizontal or vertical rectangles.

The Attempt at a Solution



So since this is a triangle, I tried to split up the volume down to two integrals, one from 0 - 1, and the other from 1-2. I used vertical rectangles by the way. So I set up my first integral as

2 \cdot \pi \int_{0}^{1} (x+2)(x) \,dx
since the shell radius would be a distance x + another 2, and then the shell height would be the x.
My second integral is

2 \cdot \pi \int_{1}^{2} (x+2)(2-x) \,dx

then I added these together, but I did not get the correct answer, could anyone show me what the error in my steps are?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I am issing 2). relevant equations. Where did you get the idea to set up the integrals as you did ?
Did you make a drawing to see if you want to integrate over dx or over dy ?

[edit]Ok, you are using vertical shells. What is their height ? x seems strange: in my drawing height decreases with x.

[edit][edit]vertical shells require bounds in x, not in y.
 
y=x is the first height,no? from 0-1 if not, then what is it
 
Ah, I see. You want to integrate over x (i.e. horizontal rings), the bounds are x=0 at the lower en x=x at the upper end , so the height is x for the first integral. And also for the second integral.

Or do you want to use vertical rings and integrate over x ? x does not exceed 1, right ?

Can you show your drawing ?
 
I vertical cylinders, I don't think you can have vertical rings. You can have horizontal rings. Here is the graph
105v0b8.jpg
 
Last edited:
Panphobia said:

Homework Statement



Calculate the volume obtained by rotating the triangle bounded by y = 0, y = x, and y = 2 - x, about the line x = -2. You may use either horizontal or vertical rectangles.

The Attempt at a Solution



So since this is a triangle, I tried to split up the volume down to two integrals, one from 0 - 1, and the other from 1-2. I used vertical rectangles by the way. So I set up my first integral as

2 \cdot \pi \int_{0}^{1} (x+2)(x) \,dx
since the shell radius would be a distance x + another 2, and then the shell height would be the x.
My second integral is

2 \cdot \pi \int_{1}^{2} (x+2)(2-x) \,dx

then I added these together, but I did not get the correct answer, could anyone show me what the error in my steps are?

Your integrals are set up correctly. You must have some mistake in your evaluating them.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Yea, I think I did miss a factor of (1/3) somewhere when I solved my integral. Thanks for the help!
 
Oh boy, my mistake: I revolved around x= -2 and had line x=0 as boundary instead of y=0. Scuse me! Eating humble pie. At least it explains why communicating was difficult.

And yes, integrals are set up correctly -- from the start :redface:.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K