Vote Now: Polls Open in Eastern USA

  • Context: News 
  • Thread starter Thread starter jtbell
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Usa
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the opening of polls in the eastern USA during an election, with participants sharing their voting experiences, thoughts on candidates, and concerns about the electoral process. The scope includes personal anecdotes, opinions on voting logistics, and reflections on the political climate.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express excitement about voting and the election results, with one noting they will vote right after their class.
  • Others share their voting experiences, including standing in line and using absentee ballots, highlighting different voting processes across states.
  • A participant mentions the use of social media to track voter turnout, noting a significant number of college students reporting their votes.
  • Concerns are raised about potential violence during the election, with multiple participants wishing for a peaceful voting experience.
  • Some participants discuss their opinions on the candidates, with one expressing a desire for Obama to win, while another critiques the portrayal of Obama in the media.
  • There is a mention of local election issues, including dissatisfaction with a county circuit court judge's outdated practices.
  • Humor is present in the discussion, with participants joking about tax cuts and their perceived wealth status.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of excitement and concern regarding the election, with some sharing positive experiences and others voicing critiques about the electoral process and candidates. There is no clear consensus on opinions about the candidates or the effectiveness of local elections.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference different voting methods and experiences, indicating a variety of electoral processes across states. There are also mentions of personal biases and frustrations regarding local governance and candidate choices.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in electoral processes, voting experiences, and the political climate during elections may find this discussion relevant.

  • #211
Moonbear said:
Ben & Jerry's is giving away ice cream?! :frown: I'm so deprived! We don't have a Ben & Jerry's store around here. I want my free ice cream too! :cry:
I'll mail you a bowl!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #212
HallsofIvy said:
I'll mail you a bowl!

Thanks...it would make a nice consolation prize. :rolleyes: :frown: Oh well, maybe in 4 years we'll finally open the doors for a viable third party candidate.
 
  • #213
So apparently there were 160 million registered voters in the US (from a wiki, so I don't know how credible it is).

With the CNN poll showing that approximately 118 million voted, we had a turnout of 73.75%. Not bad, but not as high as some people were predicting.
 
  • #214
Moonbear said:
Oh well, maybe in 4 years we'll finally open the doors for a viable third party candidate.
The only difference between a viable candidate and a non-viable one is votes. Did you vote for a third party candidate?
 
  • #215
I had pegged Obama at 350 - 400 EV. 349 is pretty darned close, but they still haven't called NC nor MO from what I can see.
 
  • #216
MO for McCain according to msnbc. But it have changed in the last 30 minutes or even less.
 
  • #217
turbo-1 said:
I had pegged Obama at 350 - 400 EV. 349 is pretty darned close, but they still haven't called NC nor MO from what I can see.
MSN gives MO to McCain. The margin is very thin so there might be a recount. However, it won't affect the outcome so it may not go to the Supreme Court. I wonder if it is worth the cost. NC has not been declared, but unless the numbers that they report change (now it's 2,101,986 Obama, 2,089,826 McCain) this will go to Obama. Ditto on the possibility of a recount.
www.msn.com
 
  • #218
A quick glance at the election map shows a strong correlation between miles of coastline (Ocean, Gulf, or Great Lake) and political orientation.
www.msn.com/
 
  • #219
It looks like Obama will pick up NC and IN, but probably lose MO.

That would give him 364 EV. Not too shabby.
 
  • #220
lisab said:
I'm so happy, my President is giving his acceptance speech now. My president - President Obama!

And a fine speech it was.

He understands the need for grace in victory. And I rather think that he will be as I have sensed all along an able leader that will build a consensus that he is uniquely qualified to build. Rather than be a nation divided, I think he will be the 21st Century's Lincoln building a Nation United.

Lincoln for his part at least lived to see the moment that the Nation was again United at least in name, as he toured the streets of Richmond shortly after its fall, the night they tore old Dixie down, but sadly days before he was shot. Weeks and months and decades of course short of healing the Nation divided. Perhaps it is now finally healed and we can move on and leave behind this notion that there are real Americans, and those that are not, living among us.
 
  • #221
LightbulbSun said:
Two words: Universal Healthcare.
Doesn't exist, anywhere.
 
  • #222
Interesting comment from the bbc (John Simpson?)
When JFK won he became the first Catholic president - which 10years earlier would have been unthinkable, now nobody (except for a few fundies) would even know it was ever an issue. The legacy of an Obama victory might be that in 20-30years nobody remembers why a black president was such a big deal.
 
  • #223
I keep seeing these clips of Jesse Jackson with tears streaming down and I have to say I think he is really really sorry he said he wanted to separate Obama from his seed bearing organs. I think he is also thinking "Why can't that be me?"

All that time with Martin Luther King, and I don't think he really got it, because I don't think he ever truly could see it outside of what he got out of it.

Looks to me like Obama understands, and seeks this power as an instrument for change, a change that he alone maybe is qualified to affect and not so much as an end to itself.
 
  • #224
mheslep said:
Doesn't exist, anywhere.

Umm... most of Europe? Or did I misunderstand something?
 
  • #225
And there's that other country that Palin can see (the not russian one)
 
  • #226
siddharth said:
Umm... most of Europe? Or did I misunderstand something?
Nothing Universal about Health Care there. In all OECD cases I am aware of a) the country has a large (and usually growing) segment private/market health providers mixed in with the government plans (as in the US), or b) the government service severely rations care so that many services are flatly denied or the queue is 6-9 months. There's nothing universal about either of those approaches IMO.
 
  • #227
mheslep said:
Nothing Universal about Health Care there. In all OECD cases I am aware of a) the country has a large (and usually growing) segment private/market health providers mixed in with the government plans (as in the US), or b) the government service severely rations care so that many services are flatly denied or the queue is 6-9 months. There's nothing universal about either of those approaches IMO.

a) Well, if you take Germany for example, the large part (~80%) is actually government funded. In India, there are government hospitals which are fully funded by the government, and also provide treatment free of cost.

See here for the statistics on % of healthcare spending supported by the government
http://www.who.int/whosis/database/core/core_select_process.cfm

b) Do you have a source for this claim? Is this problem long-lasting and widespread, or only isolated to a small number of cases or specific treatment types, and for a short-period? AFAIK, in India, services in government hospitals aren't denied, and the treatment time is usually reasonable.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #228
siddharth said:
b) Do you have a source for this claim? Is this problem long-lasting and widespread, or only isolated to a small number of cases or specific treatment types, and for a short-period?
In universal healthcare there is always an element of rationing - there will be drugs or treatments that are too expensive for the limited benefit that they give.
Usually there is a central body that licences new drugs and treatments and decides which ones will be adopted - in the UK-NHS this is NICE (National Institute of Clinical Excellence).
There are occasional rows when a new treatment isn't offered - especially one which might postpone the onset of some disease (like Alzheimer's ) but isn't a cure.
 
  • #229
mheslep said:
Nothing Universal about Health Care there.

It depends on your definition of "universal healthcare." I would define it to mean that one can obtain the same level of healthcare from the hospitals, regardless of the amount of money you have, or position in society you hold. With the NHS, for example, this is the case. That there is a private healthcare for those that choose not to take up the NHS healthcare is regardless.

Sorry: you're wrong!
 
  • #230
siddharth said:
...b) Do you have a source for this claim? Is this problem long-lasting and widespread, or only isolated to a small number of cases or specific treatment types, and for a short-period? AFAIK, in India, services in government hospitals aren't denied, and the treatment time is usually reasonable.
We're OT so moving off this thread over to here:
https://www.physicsforums.com/showpost.php?p=1944707&postcount=85
 
  • #231
Congratulations all around to President-elect Barack Obama.
 
  • #232
So it seems the PF Presidential Election 2008 poll questions, were off by a factor of 10..
The questions could have been rewritten, with following adjustments: where you see 15, make it 150.. (Obama win by over 150 electoral votes, Obama win by less than 150 electoral votes, etc.. How many guessed the spread would be that large?
 
  • #233
Cyrus said:
Bet you a PF gold membership your wrong. (That's 14 bucks USD).

john16O said:
DEAL..I am not joking either..PF gold membership...

Cyrus said:
You're on. Dead serious.

Greg, notarize this bet please.

Greg Bernhardt said:
witnessed and stamped! :biggrin:
Ok john160, you need to get your information to Greg so he can charge you for Cyrus' Gold membership.
 
  • #234
lisab said:
I'm so happy, my President is giving his acceptance speech now. My president - President Obama!

How about that; my President? It has meaning again.
 
  • #236
NC to BO according to AP. AP
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
14K
  • · Replies 70 ·
3
Replies
70
Views
9K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
9K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
5K
  • · Replies 73 ·
3
Replies
73
Views
12K