VVER Fuel Assemblies: Advanced Hexagonal Arrangement

  • Thread starter Thread starter nikkkom
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    advanced Fuel
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

VVER fuel assemblies utilize an advanced hexagonal arrangement of fuel rods, providing the most dense and uniform packing compared to typical Western PWR fuel, which predominantly uses square lattice designs. While Western suppliers like Westinghouse have developed hexagonal lattice designs such as VVantage6, the Russian nuclear engineering sector remains at the forefront of R&D in nuclear technologies, continuing to explore fast reactor designs. Despite their advancements, the Soviet safety record raises concerns regarding the safety of their reprocessing facilities and nuclear waste disposal practices. Recent developments include the transition of Zaporizhzhya NPP Unit 5 to Westinghouse fuel, which reportedly performs comparably to Russian fuel.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of VVER fuel assembly design
  • Familiarity with PWR and LWR reactor types
  • Knowledge of nuclear fuel performance metrics
  • Awareness of historical nuclear engineering advancements
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the design and performance of Westinghouse VVantage6 fuel assemblies
  • Explore the implications of hexagonal fuel arrangements in reactor efficiency
  • Investigate the safety protocols of Russian nuclear reprocessing facilities
  • Study the operational challenges of mixed fuel loads in nuclear reactors
USEFUL FOR

Nuclear engineers, reactor designers, safety analysts, and anyone involved in the development and optimization of nuclear fuel technologies.

nikkkom
Insights Author
Gold Member
Messages
2,075
Reaction score
397
I was surprised to learn recently that VVER fuel assemblies are in some respects more advanced than typical Western PWR fuel: namely, fuel rods are arranged in a hexagonal pattern in the fuel bundle:

https://www.google.cz/search?q=vver fuel&tbm=isch

This is the most dense and uniform packing. In the West, I only heard about _plans_ to use such bundles (I read about it in Japanese docs about they Reduced moderation water reactor projects).
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
Fuel pellet changes during reactor operation:

http://www.kfki.hu/~aekihp/phenomena.htm
 
Russian nuclear engineering is very advanced. They are still relatively well funded for R&D of new nuclear technologies. They also seem far more willing to take economic risks than most other countries (or corporations) and still view nuclear technology as a point of pride for a country. Plus they can leverage some of the investment in cold-war era nuclear tech/equipment. They are the only country in the world still trying to build fast reactors (everyone else gave up for now).
 
LOL I'm twenty years retired and my little reactors had skewed hex units, twisted like a bundle of pencils.
 
Doug Huffman said:
LOL I'm twenty years retired and my little reactors had skewed hex units, twisted like a bundle of pencils.

Research reactors? I have no doubts all kinds of different things (fuels, geometries, coolants...) were tried in those.
Bringing new stuff to big power reactors is vastly more difficult.
 
Hologram0110 said:
Russian nuclear engineering is very advanced. They are still relatively well funded for R&D of new nuclear technologies. They also seem far more willing to take economic risks than most other countries (or corporations) and still view nuclear technology as a point of pride for a country. Plus they can leverage some of the investment in cold-war era nuclear tech/equipment. They are the only country in the world still trying to build fast reactors (everyone else gave up for now).

The (ex-)Soviet safety record is the worst of all nuclear powers, though. I am far from sure that even today their, say, reprocessing facilities, are safe enough. They have a horrible track record in disposing of nuclear waste, one which would make Hanford look like a green meadow.
 
nikkkom said:
Research reactors? [ ... ]
~100 MWth
 
Doug Huffman said:
~100 MWth

Hmm. Elaborate :)
 
nikkkom said:
I was surprised to learn recently that VVER fuel assemblies are in some respects more advanced than typical Western PWR fuel: namely, fuel rods are arranged in a hexagonal pattern in the fuel bundle:

https://www.google.cz/search?q=vver fuel&tbm=isch

This is the most dense and uniform packing. In the West, I only heard about _plans_ to use such bundles (I read about it in Japanese docs about they Reduced moderation water reactor projects).
The US and European commercial nuclear industry settled on square lattice designs long ago. However, Westinghouse has since developed a hexagonal (triangular) lattice design, VVantage6. I think the western suppliers determined that square lattices were simpler to model and manufacture.

The Shippingport reactor had hexagonal (and skewed-hexagonal) fuel lattices.

Some history - http://www.portal.state.pa.us/porta...4569/_atoms_for_peace__in_pennsylvania/471309

Some technical documents
http://www.inl.gov/technicalpublications/Documents/2664750.pdf
http://www.osti.gov/scitech/servlets/purl/5914091

Fast reactor fuel had hexagonal geometry, and was ducted.

nikkkom said:
Fuel pellet changes during reactor operation:
http://www.kfki.hu/~aekihp/phenomena.htm
This is typical LWR UO2/MOX fuel behavior/performance.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #10
Zaporizhzhya NPP Unit 5 is going to be loaded with Westinghouse fuel:

http://www.world-nuclear-news.org/UF-Westinghouse-fuel-assemblies-arrive-at-Zaporozhe-plant-24021601.html[/PLAIN]

It's the third unit in Ukraine to start shifting to Westinghouse fuel. (They don't replace all fuel at once, so reactors will operate on a "mixed" load for a few years. This does create some difficulties, since different fuel bundles have somewhat different hydraulics).

According to Russian/Ukrainian technical forums I monitor, Westinghouse fuel performs no worse than Russian one, maybe even a tad better.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K