VVER Fuel Assemblies: Advanced Hexagonal Arrangement

  • Thread starter Thread starter nikkkom
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    advanced Fuel
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the design and characteristics of VVER fuel assemblies, particularly their hexagonal arrangement compared to Western PWR fuel designs. Participants explore the implications of this arrangement, the advancements in Russian nuclear engineering, and the historical context of fuel assembly designs.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that VVER fuel assemblies feature a hexagonal arrangement, which is claimed to be more dense and uniform than typical Western PWR fuel arrangements.
  • Others highlight that while the West has developed plans for hexagonal fuel bundles, the commercial nuclear industry has predominantly settled on square lattice designs due to perceived simplicity in modeling and manufacturing.
  • There are claims regarding the advanced state of Russian nuclear engineering, with assertions that they are more willing to take economic risks and continue to invest in R&D for new nuclear technologies.
  • Some participants express concerns about the safety record of Soviet-era nuclear facilities, particularly regarding waste disposal and the safety of reprocessing facilities.
  • A participant mentions that the Shippingport reactor utilized hexagonal and skewed-hexagonal fuel lattices, indicating historical precedents for such designs in the West.
  • There is a mention of the ongoing transition at Zaporizhzhya NPP Unit 5 to Westinghouse fuel, with discussions about the performance of mixed fuel loads and the potential advantages of Westinghouse fuel over Russian fuel.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of viewpoints regarding the advancements in VVER fuel assembly designs and the safety of Russian nuclear technology. There is no consensus on the overall superiority of one design over another, nor on the safety implications of Russian nuclear practices.

Contextual Notes

Some discussions reference historical designs and the evolution of fuel assembly geometries, indicating that the context of technological development and safety records may influence current perceptions and practices.

nikkkom
Insights Author
Gold Member
Messages
2,075
Reaction score
397
I was surprised to learn recently that VVER fuel assemblies are in some respects more advanced than typical Western PWR fuel: namely, fuel rods are arranged in a hexagonal pattern in the fuel bundle:

https://www.google.cz/search?q=vver fuel&tbm=isch

This is the most dense and uniform packing. In the West, I only heard about _plans_ to use such bundles (I read about it in Japanese docs about they Reduced moderation water reactor projects).
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
Fuel pellet changes during reactor operation:

http://www.kfki.hu/~aekihp/phenomena.htm
 
Russian nuclear engineering is very advanced. They are still relatively well funded for R&D of new nuclear technologies. They also seem far more willing to take economic risks than most other countries (or corporations) and still view nuclear technology as a point of pride for a country. Plus they can leverage some of the investment in cold-war era nuclear tech/equipment. They are the only country in the world still trying to build fast reactors (everyone else gave up for now).
 
LOL I'm twenty years retired and my little reactors had skewed hex units, twisted like a bundle of pencils.
 
Doug Huffman said:
LOL I'm twenty years retired and my little reactors had skewed hex units, twisted like a bundle of pencils.

Research reactors? I have no doubts all kinds of different things (fuels, geometries, coolants...) were tried in those.
Bringing new stuff to big power reactors is vastly more difficult.
 
Hologram0110 said:
Russian nuclear engineering is very advanced. They are still relatively well funded for R&D of new nuclear technologies. They also seem far more willing to take economic risks than most other countries (or corporations) and still view nuclear technology as a point of pride for a country. Plus they can leverage some of the investment in cold-war era nuclear tech/equipment. They are the only country in the world still trying to build fast reactors (everyone else gave up for now).

The (ex-)Soviet safety record is the worst of all nuclear powers, though. I am far from sure that even today their, say, reprocessing facilities, are safe enough. They have a horrible track record in disposing of nuclear waste, one which would make Hanford look like a green meadow.
 
nikkkom said:
Research reactors? [ ... ]
~100 MWth
 
Doug Huffman said:
~100 MWth

Hmm. Elaborate :)
 
nikkkom said:
I was surprised to learn recently that VVER fuel assemblies are in some respects more advanced than typical Western PWR fuel: namely, fuel rods are arranged in a hexagonal pattern in the fuel bundle:

https://www.google.cz/search?q=vver fuel&tbm=isch

This is the most dense and uniform packing. In the West, I only heard about _plans_ to use such bundles (I read about it in Japanese docs about they Reduced moderation water reactor projects).
The US and European commercial nuclear industry settled on square lattice designs long ago. However, Westinghouse has since developed a hexagonal (triangular) lattice design, VVantage6. I think the western suppliers determined that square lattices were simpler to model and manufacture.

The Shippingport reactor had hexagonal (and skewed-hexagonal) fuel lattices.

Some history - http://www.portal.state.pa.us/porta...4569/_atoms_for_peace__in_pennsylvania/471309

Some technical documents
http://www.inl.gov/technicalpublications/Documents/2664750.pdf
http://www.osti.gov/scitech/servlets/purl/5914091

Fast reactor fuel had hexagonal geometry, and was ducted.

nikkkom said:
Fuel pellet changes during reactor operation:
http://www.kfki.hu/~aekihp/phenomena.htm
This is typical LWR UO2/MOX fuel behavior/performance.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #10
Zaporizhzhya NPP Unit 5 is going to be loaded with Westinghouse fuel:

http://www.world-nuclear-news.org/UF-Westinghouse-fuel-assemblies-arrive-at-Zaporozhe-plant-24021601.html[/PLAIN]

It's the third unit in Ukraine to start shifting to Westinghouse fuel. (They don't replace all fuel at once, so reactors will operate on a "mixed" load for a few years. This does create some difficulties, since different fuel bundles have somewhat different hydraulics).

According to Russian/Ukrainian technical forums I monitor, Westinghouse fuel performs no worse than Russian one, maybe even a tad better.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K