andyrk
- 658
- 5
Why is friction necessary for walking? For moving/walking ahead we just need that when we push the ground the ground pushes us back. Can't we push the ground if the ground is frictionless?
Walking: Why Is Friction Necessary?
- Thread starter andyrk
- Start date
-
- Tags
- Friction
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
25 replies · 7K views
- 19,385
- 15,622
andyrk said:
Try wrapping your shoes in rags soaked in oil and then see if you can walk on glass.
andyrk
- 658
- 5
I know I wouldn't be able to but why?
darkxponent
- 387
- 8
andyrk said:
Make an FBD of a person walking
andyrk
- 658
- 5
darkxponent said:
Ok. Got it.
andyrk
- 658
- 5
But when I draw the FBD, the force which with which the feet pushes on the ground is inclined at an angle of θ with the vertical. Let the force which we exert be F. There Fcosθ=N(Normal Reaction by the ground) and Fsinθ=f(frictional force)
So the horizontal forces balance then how can we move forward?
So the horizontal forces balance then how can we move forward?
serllus reuel
- 59
- 1
In response to your original question: without friction, you can jump up and down all you want (courtesy of the normal force) But not move horizontally.
'Action' and 'reaction' forces do not 'cancel'. You push on the earth, the Earth pushes on you. result is that you move, relative to the earth, that is.
andyrk said:
'Action' and 'reaction' forces do not 'cancel'. You push on the earth, the Earth pushes on you. result is that you move, relative to the earth, that is.
andyrk
- 658
- 5
Why don't action reaction forces cancel? Normal reaction cancels weight. So friction should equal the horizontal component of force applied by the man. Shouldn't it?
darkxponent
- 387
- 8
andyrk said:
Can you show the FBD you draw to us?
Gold Member
- 5,850
- 553
The normal force is not an action reaction pair with gravity! This seems to be a really common misconception; the reaction force of the Earth's gravitational pull on you is simply your pull back on the Earth. Action reaction forces act on two different interacting objects, not on the same object.
andyrk
- 658
- 5
darkxponent said:
Here.
And WannabeNewton, yes that is correct. We generally assume that because of the FBDs we draw. In fact I don't find any difference between what you said? Not a reaction force to gravity but a reaction force for the force by which the Earth is pulling us, i.e the gravitaional force? Aren't gravity and gravitation one and the same thing?
BTW, this is the working I came up with for the use of friction as necessary for walking is this:
When we walk on a rough surface it is the roughness of the surface that makes us go forward. Like think of a rough surface as having many imperfections in it. When we walk we push the earth. Zooming in, we see that parts of our shoes/boots interlock with the imperfection. We now apply force to these imperfections which in turn exert a force on us, so we move forward.
Now had the surface been smooth there would have been nothing that would have been felt by the brunt of the horizontal component of the force we applied. This is because there are no imperfections in the way that meet out horizontal force applied. Is that correct?
So considering this the way as we walk, why don't we keep accelerating then? Because there would always be a force of friction acting on us and as force causes acceleration so we should be always accelerating as long as we walking with he same force being exerted by our foot on the ground?
Attachments
Last edited:
Gold Member
- 5,850
- 553
No we never assume that. The normal force is not a reaction force due ro gravity.
andyrk
- 658
- 5
WannabeNewton said:
Means the same thing? The normal force is not between Earth and us I guess. It is between us and the floor we are standing on. The floor experiences a push downwards because of the force exerted by us due to the earth. The floor comes in between. Actually it is the centre of the Earth that is attracting us due to the gravitational pull and not the whole earth. So the floor comes in between. As a result the floor also experiences the same force of attraction that we are experiencing due to gravity. So it thinks it is us who are applying a force on it. So it exerts a force on us. which is equal and opposite? It was written that Normal reaction is between two surfaces in contact.
serllus reuel
- 59
- 1
normal force is not reaction to gravity, it counteracts gravity. Ex: gravity of Earth acts DOWN on YOU. Normal force acts UP on YOU. They act on the SAME object and cancel. another example: You pull EARTH. Earth pulls YOU. Forces act on DIFFERENT objects. Result? YOU smash into EARTH.
darkxponent
- 387
- 8
This FBD is not correct. FBD only shows Force acting on the object. Not the forces exerted by the object. Only the forces acting on the object(that is external force) effects the motion of the object. Re-draw the FBD showing only the forces on the object. Remember Newtons second Law, it says about external forces only.
andyrk
- 658
- 5
serllus reuel said:
Yes that is correct. But where does the normal force arise from? Is it not an action reaction pair of our push and the floor's upward push? Then Why don't we fly up!Because the gravitational pull balances the the floor's push?
darkxponent
- 387
- 8
WannabeNewton said:
True that. Normal Force is not the reaction Force. The reaction Force on Earth is 'mg'. Whether the object is falling(where there is no Normal) or is placed at surface(where Normal is present). Normal Force is Contact Force.
andyrk
- 658
- 5
So we just act as an isolated body on which gravitational force and normal force act. Right?
andyrk
- 658
- 5
Why don't we accelerate because of frictional force then?
darkxponent
- 387
- 8
andyrk said:
We do. A container in trck ses friction to accelerate!
darkxponent
- 387
- 8
andyrk said:
The concept of drawing FBD is that only. Isolate a body from a system and show external forces on it.
andyrk
- 658
- 5
So can we never walk at a steady speed on a rough road because friction is always acting so we always keep accelerating?darkxponent said:
darkxponent
- 387
- 8
andyrk said:
and retarding too. So average speed is constant!
- 42,946
- 10,550
andyrk said:
Acceleration occurs when the sum of forces in some direction is not zero. If there are forces tending to slow you down then you will need some other force to balance them if you want to move at constant velocity. Suppose you're walking into a wind. You need to push back on the ground; the reaction from the ground can balance the force from the wind. To get that reaction from the ground you need friction. Your feet, in a sense, are trying to move backwards relative to the ground. Friction opposes relative motion of surfaces in contact. So the friction pushes you forward.
shadowfalcon
- 7
- 0
This is a really general answer...
When a person is walking, he or she pushes backwards on the ground. According to Newton's third law, the ground pushes back on the person which helps him or her accelerate forwards. If you want a real life application, think about an icy ring. It is really hard for the person to move forwards because the frictional force is very small but not necessarily negligible. Therefore, the force that the ice pushes on the person must be very small as well, leading to a minimal acceleration.
When a person is walking, he or she pushes backwards on the ground. According to Newton's third law, the ground pushes back on the person which helps him or her accelerate forwards. If you want a real life application, think about an icy ring. It is really hard for the person to move forwards because the frictional force is very small but not necessarily negligible. Therefore, the force that the ice pushes on the person must be very small as well, leading to a minimal acceleration.
- 10,546
- 2,324
andyrk said:
Your FBD only shows the foot. As it stands.. The amputated foot isn't moving (it's not sliding along the ground) so the forces must sum to zero.
You can counter by pointing out that the body is moving but your diagram does not show the body or the other forces acting on it.
If you show all the forces on the whole body it should become clear. For example the reaction force N is behind the centre of gravity.