CrackerMcGinger
- 86
- 4
Wow. That's sad.
the shortest ice age lasted around 150 years, so the flare idea is possible, and an extremily powerful flare thatr misses the planet could still be powerfull enough to cause a severe world wide emp.DHF said:Well ultimatly I don't know if he will go with a flare because he did mention that he wanted the effect to be perment. The effects of a flare would be brief.
A flare is a good device for any number of other things in a book. Flares at low levels can temporarily disrupt communications but sufficiently powerful flares can disrupt the atmosphere itself. Any such flare would also slam a tremendous amount of radiation into the planet and we would probably be looking at mass extinctions so its a good plot device if you want a real post world feeling.
As to causing an ice age, I am not a planetary scientist so I don't know for sure but I imagine if the atmosphere was significantly disturbed, its possible.
but 150 years later most of the planet not directly hit by the radiation would be almost okay(as in habitable) right?DHF said:well if the flare is that powerful, its not just the EMP that is hitting us, tons of lethal radiation would as well. the physical pop of flame that you typically see images of would never come anywhere near our orbit but the burst of radiation would spread out in a fairly wide path. If it was powerful enough to cause the effects we are talking about, the ice age would salt on the wound because that would be on top a devastating blow not only to human population but life across the entire biosphere.
I think however that this is quite different then what the Original poster was looking for.
DHF said:... the ice age would salt on the wound because that would be on top a devastating blow not only to human population but life across the entire biosphere.
I think however that this is quite different then what the Original poster was looking for.
DHF said:As for global communication, I think its possible as the postal services will thrive in the absence of phones and email. even back in the 19th century you could communicate between countries, the only difference is that those communications will take weeks or months. Communications within countries will be relatively easy if you are giving the character motor transport. Mind you most cars today will need to be scrapped or severely refitted as they are glutted with electronics and will not run without power.
Caitriona said:Yep, there will be postal service, but like you said, it will take days, weeks and months for mail to be delivered, depending on the distance it's sent. I'm also thinking engines will be used by rich people and some parts of the industry and maybe the government, so yes, mail can be transported by train or steam boat or even by trucks (though I think that might not be very cost effective), but the average person may not really have a car, as it would be quite expensive to build and maintain, right? Obtaining fuel alone would be a costly endeavour. Horses and carriages would be far more convenient and cost effective for "normal people".
Loren said:That could be an improvement for some mail in the US.
Caitriona said:*lol* but since this story is not set in the US, let's just assume postal service would be slightly for the worse compared to today![]()
Caitriona said:I'm not a physicist and my research so far only led me to doomsday-preppers who believe a global blackout might happen at some point but most certainly wouldn't be permanent. Well, I need it to be permanent.

Caitriona said:I have been thinking about that whole "people are forced back into the stone age by a cult" thing before, but that is not the road I will pick for this story. It doesn't fit my characters at all. But thank you for mentioning it!
Not really, all religion really is is a way to grasp reality without thinking everything is a coincidence, and those that think you are telling a story opposing religion are short sided or don't care to think from another point of view. All someone really needs to grasp religion even if they do not believe is an ability to broaden their perspective on things.Caitriona said:I'm afraid as a total non-believer myself I lack the insight to write about anything that will involve a lot of religion. I simply don't have the ability to grasp the whole concept of belief in a higher power. If I were to write such a thing, it would ultimate turn out to be a statement against religion, no matter how much effort I would put into it to treat the whole topic respectfully and with empathy. It is just not something I can comprehend very well, which is why I abandoned that idea very early on and instead started looking for a strictly scientific explanation.
Caitriona said:I'm afraid as a total non-believer myself I lack the insight to write about anything that will involve a lot of religion.