Ward-Takahashi identity and renormalization

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the Ward-Takahashi (WT) identity and its implications for the renormalization of quantum field theories, particularly Quantum Electrodynamics (QED). Participants explore the relationship between gauge invariance and renormalizability, as well as the role of WT identities in addressing divergences in perturbation theory.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about how the WT identity aids in the renormalization process of quantum field theories like QED.
  • Another participant suggests that the gauge symmetry of the photon protects it from being non-renormalizable and posits that the WT identity ensures the preservation of gauge invariance at the quantum level.
  • A question is raised about whether the explicit use of WT identities is necessary to show the cancellation of divergent parts of amplitudes in perturbation theory, or if this cancellation is merely a consequence of gauge invariance.
  • It is asserted that the WT identities are essential for the Dyson renormalizability of theories such as QED, with an example provided regarding the four-photon vertex and its divergence.
  • Clarification is offered that massive vector fields do not inherently lead to non-renormalizable models, citing the standard model as an example where massive W- and Z-bosons are still part of a renormalizable theory due to local gauge invariance being preserved through spontaneous symmetry breaking.
  • The Stückelberg model is mentioned as a method to give mass to gauge bosons while maintaining local gauge invariance, referencing historical work on effective renormalizable theories for neutral light vector mesons.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the necessity of WT identities for demonstrating amplitude cancellations in perturbation theory, indicating that multiple competing perspectives exist regarding the relationship between gauge invariance and renormalization.

Contextual Notes

Some claims depend on specific definitions of renormalizability and gauge invariance, and there are unresolved aspects regarding the implications of the WT identity in various contexts.

samuelr85
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
What I don't understand about WT identity is how it allows or helps you to renormalize a quantum field theory (es. QED). Not in details, just the basic ideas, if possible.
Thanks in advice
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not entirely sure but I've heard that a massive spin one field is non-renormalizable. The gauge symmetry of the photon "protects" the photon from being non-renormalizable. The Ward-Takahashi identity says that gauge invariance is preserved at the quantum level. So I guess the Ward-Takahashi identity tells you that quantum fluctuations don't break gauge invariance and hence the renormalizability of the theory.
 
Thanks for your answer, it make sense. Do you think you need to explicitly use the WT identities for showing that the divergent parts of the amplitudes cancel each other, at a given order of perturbation theory? Or that cancellation is it just a consequence of the presence of gauge invariance?
 
Indeed, the Ward-Takahashi identities for local Abelian gauge symmetries are necessary for the Dyson renormalizability of such theories like QED. E.g., from naive power counting the four-photon vertex is logarithmically divergent. However, the WTI for this vertex ensures that it is finite. For details, see

http://fias.uni-frankfurt.de/~hees/publ/lect.pdf

It is also not true that massive vector fields lead necessarily to non-renormalizable models. E.g., the standard model is renormalizable although the W- and Z-bosons are massive. This is due to the fact that this theory is still a non-Abelian gauge theory, i.e., the action is invariant under local gauge transformations, but this local symmetry is spontaneously broken. This provides mass to the gauge bosons without breaking gauge invariance, and thus the theory stays renormalizable. This Higgs mechanism predicts the existence of a massive scalar boson, the famous Higgs boson.

For the Abelian case, one can give the gauge boson even a mass by hand (i.e., without using spontaneous symmetry breaking of the local gauge symmetry), and still keep the theory invariant under local gauge transformations. This is the Stückelberg model, rediscovered by Kroll, Lee, and Zumino to build an effective renormalizable theory for the (neutral) light vector mesons, \rho, \quad \omega, and \phi:

Kroll, N. M., Lee, T. D., and Zumino, B.: Neutral Vector Mesons and the Hadronic Electromagnetic Current , Phys. Rev. 157, volume 157, 1376, 1967
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
13K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K