Was I Spotting Mars in the East?

  • Thread starter Thread starter TeddeF
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    mars
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on identifying Mars in the night sky, particularly its visibility in the east while Venus and Jupiter set in the west. Mars appears as a bright orange point of light, currently near opposition, making it the brightest it will be for the next year. The haze in the atmosphere can create a glow around it, which is normal. A key tip for distinguishing planets from stars is that planets typically do not twinkle, unlike stars. The conversation highlights the excitement of amateur astronomy and the shared experiences of identifying celestial objects.
TeddeF
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Good morning, yesterday night I was out for a walk, and as usual - Venus and Jupiter rose in the West which is pretty hard to miss. But I also knew that Mars would rise in the East. I spotted a red shining point of light in the east and in the hazy city sky I assumed this was Mars. So my question is, was this Mars? And is it identifiable by a red glim or am I completely out sailing?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Things don't rise in the west, they set in the west. Venus and Jupiter (which are currently in conjunction) will be setting in the evening.

Mars will appear as a bright "red" point of light. It's more of an orange color to the eye than red. Mars is currently in the constellation Leo, the only other bright red star near it at the moment is Arcturus in the constellation Bootes, but Mars is markedly brighter than Arcturus (not always, but Mars is currently near opposition so it's the brightest it will appear for the next year).

I don't know what you mean by "glim" (is that even a word?) but you're correct that Mars will be to the east as Venus and Jupiter are setting in the west. Assuming you only saw one bright red point, then it was probably Mars. Any halo or glow surrounding the planet is just due to scattering of light by a hazy atmosphere, which is just water vapor and dust in the air.
 
Thanks for correcting me, I replaced rose with the sun setting for some reason. And yes, I believe that glim is a synonym to shine or light. But this is cool, thank you for replying - now I know :-)
 
At around midnight, Mars will be very close to overhead. If you are out around 8-9 pm then Mars should be about halfway up in the sky in the East.
 
Something else that has helped me confirm whether a particular object is a planet or star--planets as a rule don't twinkle, while stars usually do. I've been an amateur astronomer for 43 years, and still I find this a useful bit of trivia...
 
NeuronsAtWork said:
Something else that has helped me confirm whether a particular object is a planet or star--planets as a rule don't twinkle, while stars usually do. I've been an amateur astronomer for 43 years, and still I find this a useful bit of trivia...

Likewise been into astronomy for as long and I still haven't figured that one out ! Haha
Purposely haven't searched google ... Was hoping to figure an explanation other ways but haven't


Dave
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top