Waterloo vs. Minnesota Duluth for physics M.Sc.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the decision between pursuing a physics M.Sc. at the University of Minnesota, Duluth, and the University of Waterloo. The University of Duluth offers limited opportunities in string cosmology with one professor, while Waterloo provides a chance to work in experimental physics with potential projects at the nearby Perimeter Institute. The participant is weighing the benefits of graduating from a prestigious institution like Waterloo against the lack of a full thesis in string theory. The conversation highlights the importance of research experience in high-energy physics (HEP) and its relevance for future PhD applications.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of string theory and its subfields
  • Familiarity with high-energy physics (HEP) and quantum field theory (QFT)
  • Knowledge of research opportunities in physics graduate programs
  • Awareness of the role of institutions like the Perimeter Institute in academic research
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the University of Waterloo's physics M.Sc. program and its faculty
  • Explore the research focus of the professor at the University of Minnesota, Duluth
  • Investigate the impact of research experience in experimental physics on PhD admissions
  • Learn about the Perimeter Institute's summer projects and visiting research opportunities
USEFUL FOR

Prospective physics graduate students, particularly those interested in string theory and experimental physics, as well as individuals considering the implications of their research focus on future academic opportunities.

David DCruz
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
I received acceptances from the University of Minnesota, Duluth (not Twin Cities) and the University of Waterloo for their physics M.Sc. programs. I am interested in string theory - not exactly sure about the subfield.

At Duluth, there is only one professor working in string cosmology who I think was open to me joining his group during email conversations - he didn't explicitly say this but he mentioned something about a reading course as preparation.

On the other hand, at Waterloo I will be working in an experimental field (not high energy physics) - the supervisor is decided at the time of admission. I am not sure what are the chances of changing advisors but I'm not banking on it. I do however feel that the close proximity to Perimeter Institute might offer a chance to do a summer project or some project on the side alongside my experimental thesis.

I know the decision is mine in the end but I wanted your opinion on a few things. Would graduating from Waterloo (better department) offset the lack of a full thesis in string theory (I might have a smaller project at Perimeter) when I apply for PhD programs in the US or Canada in the future? If I decide to go to Waterloo and do a small project at Perimeter, are my chances of getting a PhD admit with that same group considerable (assuming I do good work)? If you believe I should consider other factors when I'm deciding, please do let me know. I have till Wednesday June 1st to decide. Any help is very appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think being near the Perimeter is a huge plus. There are wonderful people there and also a lot of very famous professors regularly visit for a few months over the summer (they have visiting research chairs).

I also think that if you are planning on getting a PhD in the US, having research experience in HEP Ex rather than in theory may not be a bad thing. It seems that people in HEP ex do need to know a lot of QFT, so if you took those classes during your masters, you would would be able to come into grad school and take strings right away:
 
Thanks very much for shedding some light on Perimeter.
radium said:
having research experience in HEP Ex rather than in theory may not be a bad thing.:
My experimental research project will be in quantum information and foundations in quantum theory.
 
Oh ok, I think that should be fine too.
 
Just a clarification. I emailed the professor at Minnesota and he said that he specifically works in cosmic strings which according to him are not directly related to string theory - they're more like topological solutions to field theories.

Guess this info slightly favors choosing Waterloo (although understanding QFT now will help in string theory research later)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
970