Water's Crucial Role in the Efficiency of Kalina Cycle Power Generation

  • Thread starter Thread starter pranj5
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cycle Water
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the role of water in the Kalina Cycle, a thermodynamic process that utilizes a mixture of water and ammonia as a working fluid for power generation. Participants explore the efficiency implications of using water in conjunction with ammonia, comparing it to other cycles and examining the energy requirements for compression.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant explains that ammonia is the main working fluid in the Kalina Cycle, and its mixture with water allows for lower energy consumption during compression compared to compressing ammonia alone.
  • Another participant suggests that water expands significantly when boiled, which may influence the efficiency of the cycle and reduce the amount of ammonia needed.
  • A challenge is raised regarding the sufficiency of ammonia alone for the cycle, prompting a request for calculations comparing the power needed for compressing ammonia in gaseous state versus in the Kalina Cycle.
  • Some participants argue that while ammonia could theoretically suffice, water is more cost-effective, emphasizing the importance of power consumption in the compression process.
  • There is a mention of the Kalina Cycle having more equipment than an Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC), with a focus on heat separation and cooling efficiency.
  • A participant clarifies that the pressurizer in the system performs the compression of the ammonia-steam mixture.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the necessity of water in the Kalina Cycle, with some arguing it is essential for efficiency while others believe ammonia alone could suffice. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the comparative power requirements and the overall efficiency implications.

Contextual Notes

Some claims depend on specific assumptions about the behavior of ammonia and water under varying conditions, and there are unresolved calculations regarding the energy requirements for compression in different scenarios.

pranj5
Messages
385
Reaction score
5
I hope may of us here have idea about Kalina Cycle. In this process, a mixture of water and ammonia is used and ammonia is the main working fluid to rotate the turbine (or other machinery) to produce power. In this process, water is first used to absorb ammonia at the Condenser and the this water-ammonia mixture is pressurised and this pressurised mixture is heated and inside a chamber, the pressurised mixture is released to a lower pressure level and the ammonia is separated from water. This hot ammonia then rotates a turbine (or other machinery) and produce power/electricity. After that, the comparatively colder ammonia goes to the Condenser and then remixed with the water again. The water is being cooled as much as possible before being injected into the Condenser again.
Now, question is, what's the role of water here and why ammonia isn't directly being compressed. The answer is simple. If, instead of being mixed with water, ammonia will be compressed directly; the power consumption will just simply skyrocket and it would be simply impossible for the cycle to produce net power. Ammonia, like other gases, will behave in the same manner when compressed alone. But, when mixed with water, it behaves like a liquid and takes far far less energy to compress.
That's my opinion. What do other think about this matter?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Hi pranj5,
Here is what I think is happening in the Katlina cycle. Water expands by about 1600 times when boiled at 100c and atmospheric pressure. Ammonia expands by about 850 times when boiled at −33.34 °C and atmospheric pressure.
This is like an organic Rankine cycle that is including an additional distillation process. The water simply reduces the quantity of ammonia required. As the temperature rises the ammonia boils first, increasing the pressure and increasing the point that the water will boil. If the ammonia content is too low then some water vapor will enter the cycle.
It seems like a good idea, a slightly modified household unit could provide electricity, hot water and moonshine.
 
If what you have said is true, then just the ammonia would be enough. Kindly try to calculate the power necessary to compress ammonia in gaseous state and compare that with the power needed in Kalina cycle.
 
pranj5 said:
just the ammonia would be enough.
My opinion, is yes ammonia is enough, however water is cheaper. No calculations required.
Good Luck
 
The ammonia here will be in closed loop and therefore whether it's more costly than water doesn't matter. What matter is the power consumption to compress ammonia alone in comparison to ammonia mixed in water. When mixed with water, ammonia will behave like a liquid and therefore much less power would be needed to compress it to higher pressure.
 
The Kalina cycle in the link below has more equipment than an ORC cycle they both use the same OP. All the additional equipment in the Kalina cycle is to separate the heat out of the stream coming from the turbine and move the heat past the cooling liquid. The system is better because the cooling section dose less cooling. I see no compressors.

http://www.globalgeothermal.com/Thermodynamic.aspx#
 
The pressuriser here, that pressurises the ammonia-steam mixture does the job of compression here.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
15K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
7K
Replies
4
Views
6K