Wave equation, general solution, cylindrical symmetry

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the general solutions to the wave equation in cylindrical coordinates, specifically addressing the complexity of deriving solutions compared to linear and spherical coordinates. The general solution for radial cylindrical coordinates was initially proposed as a f(r-ct)*Log(r) + b g(r+ct)*Log(r), but this was found to yield a residual, indicating that the cylindrical solution applies only to static cases. The complete wave equation in cylindrical coordinates is presented, leading to the conclusion that Bessel's functions are necessary for solving the wave equation in this context, as they represent modes in a cylindrical space.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of wave equations and their general solutions
  • Familiarity with cylindrical and spherical coordinate systems
  • Knowledge of Bessel's functions and their applications
  • Basic calculus, particularly in relation to partial differential equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and properties of Bessel's functions
  • Learn about the application of the wave equation in cylindrical coordinates
  • Explore the relationship between wave equations and Fourier series
  • Investigate the initial conditions and their role in determining specific solutions
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and engineers working with wave phenomena, particularly those focusing on cylindrical symmetry and partial differential equations.

lalbatros
Messages
1,247
Reaction score
2
I was interrested in the general solutions to the wave equation depending on only one spatial coordinate.

For one linear coordinate, the general solution is:
a f(x-ct) + b g(x+ct)​

For one radial spherical coordinate, the general solution is:
a f(r-ct)/r + b g(r+ct)/r​

I thought that for a radial cylindrical coordinate, the solution would be:
a f(r-ct)*Log(r) + b g(r+ct)*Log(r)​

Yet I found this is not a solution since I got this residual for the wave equation:
D²(f(r-ct)/r) = a (2+Log(r))*f'(r-ct)/r + b (2+Log(r))*g'(r+ct)/r​

This would indicate that the cylindrical solution applies only to the static case.

Any comment on this surprise?
Did I do a mistake in the calculations, of does that instead mean something?
Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The complete wave equation in cylindrical coordinates is:

\frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial t^2}=c^2\left[\frac{1}{\rho}\frac{\partial}{\partial \rho}\left(\rho\frac{\partial u}{\partial \rho}\right)+\frac{1}{\rho^2}\frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial \theta^2}+\frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial z^2}\right]

But if you want a symmetry around the z-axis, you can suppose that the function is constant for \theta and z, so you get the equation:

\frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial t^2}=\frac{c^2}{\rho}\frac{\partial}{\partial \rho}\left(\rho\frac{\partial u}{\partial \rho}\right)

Which look like the spherical coordinates version but is much more difficult to solve. In fact, this is the wave equation in 2D polar coordinates.

The solution to this equation uses Bessel's functions, which are represented by Taylor series, not a closed form. It's strange that the solution in 2D is much more complicated that the solution in 3D.
 
(warning: my post does not really contribute anything meaningful to the discussion)
GPPaille said:
The solution to this equation uses Bessel's functions.
I was under the impression that the solution to this equation was what defined bessel functions. I could be wrong, though.
 
siyphsc: Yes, but I forgot to mention that this not gives a general solution, but only the steady state solution. So this says that the solution u(\rho,t) is separable:

u(\rho,t)=u_s(\rho)u_t(t)

Bessel's functions are modes in a cylindrical space for the radial component, like sinusoidal functions are modes in a 1D space.
 
In Landau and Lifgarbagez, Fluid Mechanics book, it gives as a general solution to the wave equation with cylindrical symmetry (Section 71):

\begin{equation}
\psi = \int_{ct-\rho}^{ct+\rho}\frac{F(\xi)}{\sqrt{\rho^2-(\xi-ct)^2}}
\end{equation}

The way he derives this form is by integrating out the z-dependence of the spherically symmetric solutions in 3D. Note that F is a general function that is found by satisfying the initial conditions of the wave.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K