Undergrad Wave function collapse in a double slit experiment

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the wave function collapse observed in the double slit experiment, particularly with discrete particles. It is established that when two paths are available, an interference pattern emerges, while a single path results in no pattern, illustrating the concept of wave function collapse. The conversation emphasizes that wave function collapse is a conceptual framework rather than a strict mathematical component of quantum mechanics. Additionally, it highlights the importance of distinguishing between experiments involving discrete particles and those involving light, as the latter does not demonstrate quantum mechanics effectively.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of wave function collapse in quantum mechanics
  • Familiarity with the double slit experiment and its implications
  • Knowledge of decoherence and its role in quantum measurements
  • Experience with experimental setups involving discrete particles
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "single photon double slit" experiments to explore practical applications
  • Study the concept of decoherence in quantum mechanics
  • Examine the mathematical formalism of quantum mechanics without wave function collapse
  • Investigate single-slit diffraction patterns and their significance in quantum experiments
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, quantum mechanics students, and researchers interested in experimental quantum phenomena and the implications of wave function collapse in quantum theory.

Sandeep T S
Messages
67
Reaction score
0
Is anyone did experiment on wave function collapse in double slit experiment. Could you please share information about that, and also share research paper about that experiment.
What kind of observation done here, what kind of equipment used for that?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do remember that wave function collapse is not, strictly speaking, part the mathematical formalism of quantum mechanics. It's one of several ways of talking about what the math says happens during an interaction with macroscopic objects (such as a barrier with slits in it, or a measuring device)and it's perfectly possible to do QM without collapse.

But with that said, just about any form of the double slit experiment with discrete particles (if you're doing it with light instead of discrete particles you aren't demonstrating QM at all, you're replicating Young's classical experiment from 1805 that shows the wave nature of light) shows the effect that we call wave function collapse. If two paths are available to the particles, an interference pattern will form; if only one path is available the pattern will not form. In collapse interpretations we say that whatever interaction excluded one path (for example, triggering or not triggering a detector at one or the other slit) collapsed the wave function from "superposition of both paths" to "just the one possible path".

Googling for "single photon double slit" will lead to to some actual experiments.
 
Nugatory said:
Do remember that wave function collapse is not, strictly speaking, part the mathematical formalism of quantum mechanics. It's one of several ways of talking about what the math says happens during an interaction with macroscopic objects (such as a barrier with slits in it, or a measuring device)and it's perfectly possible to do QM without collapse.

But with that said, just about any form of the double slit experiment with discrete particles (if you're doing it with light instead of discrete particles you aren't demonstrating QM at all, you're replicating Young's classical experiment from 1805 that shows the wave nature of light) shows the effect that we call wave function collapse. If two paths are available to the particles, an interference pattern will form; if only one path is available the pattern will not form. In collapse interpretations we say that whatever interaction excluded one path (for example, triggering or not triggering a detector at one or the other slit) collapsed the wave function from "superposition of both paths" to "just the one possible path".

Googling for "single photon double slit" will lead to to some actual experiments.
Why not diffraction patterns seen when single Photon going to single slit.?
 
A single photon will give a single hit only, not a pattern. In interpretations with a collapse that is the collapse.
Many individual photons sent through a single slit will give a single-slit pattern.
 
mfb said:
A single photon will give a single hit only, not a pattern. In interpretations with a collapse that is the collapse.
Many individual photons sent through a single slit will give a single-slit pattern.
I know that. I want to ask, decoherence occur when we observe double slit experiment. In there photons distribute along with each slit. Why don't we observe diffraction pattern in single slit after decoherence.
interference pattern occur when a photon superpose to them self, then what is the reason of diffraction pattern in single slit experiment if we use single photon at a time.
 
Nugatory said:
Do remember that wave function collapse is not, strictly speaking, part the mathematical formalism of quantum mechanics. It's one of several ways of talking about what the math says happens during an interaction with macroscopic objects (such as a barrier with slits in it, or a measuring device)and it's perfectly possible to do QM without collapse.

But with that said, just about any form of the double slit experiment with discrete particles (if you're doing it with light instead of discrete particles you aren't demonstrating QM at all, you're replicating Young's classical experiment from 1805 that shows the wave nature of light) shows the effect that we call wave function collapse. If two paths are available to the particles, an interference pattern will form; if only one path is available the pattern will not form. In collapse interpretations we say that whatever interaction excluded one path (for example, triggering or not triggering a detector at one or the other slit) collapsed the wave function from "superposition of both paths" to "just the one possible path".

Googling for "single photon double slit" will lead to to some actual experiments.
What is mechanism of sensor which lead to decoherence.
 
Sandeep T S said:
Why don't we observe diffraction pattern in single slit after decoherence.
We do.
We design our experiments around two-slit interference because the one-slit diffraction pattern is harder to calculate and less easily measured than the two-slit interference pattern and doesn't tell us anything that we won't learn from the double-slit measurement. But single-slit diffraction is there if we look for it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
7K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
8K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
662
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
8K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
606
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
7K