Wave function phase relationships

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the complex nature of wave functions in quantum mechanics, specifically the relationship between a wave function (psi) and its conjugate (psi*). It is established that the square modulus of the wave function, represented as psi*psi, consistently reflects the probability density, regardless of whether the particles are bound or free. The conversation also delves into the implications of orbital state transitions governed by the Schrödinger equation, highlighting that the phase of the wave function cannot be precisely determined during these transitions. Furthermore, the discussion raises questions about the conservation of energy in non-dissipative spaces as described by Noether's theorem, particularly during photon absorption or emission.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of complex numbers and their properties
  • Familiarity with wave functions and probability densities in quantum mechanics
  • Knowledge of the Schrödinger equation and its implications
  • Awareness of Noether's theorem and its relation to conservation laws
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the implications of the Schrödinger equation on wave function transitions
  • Investigate the role of Hermitian operators in quantum mechanics
  • Study the concept of entanglement and its effects on wave functions
  • Examine the relationship between energy conservation and quantum state transitions
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, students of quantum mechanics, and researchers interested in wave function behavior and energy conservation principles in quantum systems.

DmplnJeff
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
The wave function is complex. I was taught that its square (probability) was actually psi times it's conjugate. Does this relationship always hold or was this only for bound and free particles?

In other words is it possible for psi and psi* to change phases during orbital state transitions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That's a universal property of complex numbers--the magnitude squared of the number is always equal to the number times its conjugate. You can see this by looking at the definition of a complex number:

Z = x + iy
Z^* = x - iy
ZZ^* = (x + iy)(x - iy) = x^2 -i^2y^2 = x^2 + y^2

So in polar coordinates, where r = \sqrt{x^2 + y^2}, the number times its conjugate will always be r^2.
 
Let us suppose that there are two, spacelike separated electron in coordinate eigenstates. In the next moment, they begin to propagate as two spherical waves. (Better to say: the probability densities do propagate.)

What happens when these waves overlap? There are two possibilities (as I think):

1) The electrons entangle and there will be only one two-electron instead of two electrons,
2) They overlap without any interaction.
 
DmplnJeff said:
The wave function is complex. I was taught that its square (probability) was actually psi times it's conjugate. Does this relationship always hold or was this only for bound and free particles?

Its square modulus is always psi*psi. The easiness with which we ascribe a probabilistic interpretation to this modulus is dictated on whether psi is an element of a Hilbert space, thus is finite norm, or its modulus is finite, so it can be rescaled to unity.

DmplnJeff said:
In other words is it possible for psi and psi* to change phases during orbital state transitions?

The orbital state transitions are determined by an external intervention in an initially closed atomic system. The dynamics is then described by the Schroedinger equation whose solution cannot be really found analytically. The phase of the wavefunction during transition cannot be therefore determined exactly, but only proved to different than the one pertaining to a wavefunction of an unperturbed atomic system.
 
If psi^2 represents the probability distribution of the location, could psi and psi* represent two locations for the same object. For example a point mass could conceivably have a slightly separate location for its momentum moment and its gravitational moment.

Basically I'm trying to understand what solutions are available for Schroedinger's equation during the transition (if Schroedinger's equation applies?). So far what I've read amounts to a transition being some sort of miracle. It just happens.

Possible solutions depend on whether psi^2 is one number squared or two numbers.
 
Let me try rephrasing the question. It's my understanding the Hermitian nature of the phase space arises from the conservation of energy through the Noether theorem.

That theorem applies to non-dissipative spaces. Yet during the absorption (or emission) of a photon energy is not being conserved (locally). Why doesn't that make a difference?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
6K
  • · Replies 71 ·
3
Replies
71
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K