Wave interferance and determining an unknown height

  • Thread starter Thread starter chris097
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Height Wave
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The problem involves calculating the height of a cliff using radio wave interference principles. The wavelength of the radio waves is 231 m, and the first minimum of destructive interference occurs at an angle of 23.7° above the horizon. The calculations indicate that the path length difference is half a wavelength (115.5 m), leading to a calculated height of 550.7 m for the cliff. However, there is a suggestion that the angle used in the calculations may not be appropriate, indicating a need for further geometric analysis.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of wave interference, specifically destructive interference
  • Knowledge of trigonometric functions and their applications in physics
  • Familiarity with the concept of path length difference in wave phenomena
  • Ability to apply the sine function in real-world scenarios
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the principles of wave interference and calculate path length differences
  • Study trigonometric applications in physics, focusing on angles of incidence and reflection
  • Explore geometric representations of wave paths to clarify angle usage
  • Investigate the effects of phase changes on wave reflection
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, particularly those focusing on wave mechanics and interference patterns, as well as anyone involved in solving real-world problems related to wave propagation and reflection.

chris097
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Radio waves from a star, of wavelength 231 m, reach a radio telescope by two separate paths. One is a direct path to the receiver, which is situated on the edge of a cliff by the ocean. The second is by reflection off the water. The first minimum of destructive interference occurs when the star is 23.7° above the horizon. Calculate the height of the cliff. (Assume no phase change on reflection.)


The attempt at a solution


Since its destructive interference, the difference between the two lengths is half a wavelength (=115.5 m).
So let's say L-D=115.5 m.
D = Lsin(90-23.7) = Lsin(66.3)
L - (0.916)L = 115.5 m
0.0843L = 115.5 m
L = 1370 m

Height = Lsin(23.7)
= 550.7 m


Any idea what I'm doing wrong? Thanks :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
chris097 said:
The attempt at a solution

Since its destructive interference, the difference between the two lengths is half a wavelength (=115.5 m).
So let's say L-D=115.5 m.
D = Lsin(90-23.7) = Lsin(66.3)
I don't think 23.7 is the angle to use here. Did you draw a figure to show what is going on?

The rest of it looks okay:
L - (0.916)L = 115.5 m
0.0843L = 115.5 m
L = 1370 m

Height = Lsin(23.7)
= 550.7 m


Any idea what I'm doing wrong? Thanks :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K