Calculating Time Delay for Radio Telescope Pointing

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the necessary time delay for signals received by a radio telescope's antennas, which are separated by 55 meters, to effectively point at a celestial object. The problem involves understanding wave propagation, specifically in the context of radio waves at a frequency of 3.0 MHz.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss using the relationship between distance, wavelength, and angle to determine the necessary time delay. There are attempts to calculate the distance difference based on the angle of incoming signals and the separation of the antennas.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on the correct speed of radio waves, emphasizing that they travel at the speed of light rather than the speed of sound. There is an ongoing exploration of the relationship between frequency, wavelength, and the time delay needed for the signals.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of optics and wave behavior, with some expressing difficulty in visualizing the geometric aspects of the problem. There is a hint that the speed of radio waves is crucial to the calculations being discussed.

toothpaste666
Messages
517
Reaction score
20

Homework Statement


A radio telescope, whose two antennas are separated by 55 m, is designed to receive 3.0-MHz radio waves produced by astronomical objects. The received radio waves create 3.0-MHz electronic signals in the telescope's left and right antennas. These signals then travel by equal-length cables to a centrally located amplifier, where they are added together. The telescope can be "pointed" to a certain region of the sky by adding the instantaneous signal from the right antenna to a "time-delayed" signal received by the left antenna a time Δt ago. (This time delay of the left signal can be easily accomplished with the proper electronic circuit.)
If a radio astronomer wishes to "view" radio signals arriving from an object oriented at a 12 ∘ angle to the vertical as in the figure (Figure 1) , what time delay Δt is necessary?

g34-jpg.75226.jpg

Homework Equations



dx/l = m(lambda)

The Attempt at a Solution



i use dx/l = dsin(theta)
x = lsin(theta)
they give me l = 55 m theta = 12 degrees
x = 55sin(12) = 11.4 m
which is the distance ahead that one sound wave is of the other
sound travels 343 m/s so it travels that distance in
1 s/ 343m (11.4 m) = .033 seconds
so that is how much they need to delay the signal.

is this valid?
 

Attachments

  • g34.jpg
    g34.jpg
    5.6 KB · Views: 846
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
toothpaste666 said:

Homework Statement


A radio telescope, whose two antennas are separated by 55 m, is designed to receive 3.0-MHz radio waves produced by astronomical objects. The received radio waves create 3.0-MHz electronic signals in the telescope's left and right antennas. These signals then travel by equal-length cables to a centrally located amplifier, where they are added together. The telescope can be "pointed" to a certain region of the sky by adding the instantaneous signal from the right antenna to a "time-delayed" signal received by the left antenna a time Δt ago. (This time delay of the left signal can be easily accomplished with the proper electronic circuit.)
If a radio astronomer wishes to "view" radio signals arriving from an object oriented at a 12 ∘ angle to the vertical as in the figure (Figure 1) , what time delay Δt is necessary?

g34-jpg.75226.jpg

Homework Equations



dx/l = m(lambda)

The Attempt at a Solution



i use dx/l = dsin(theta)
x = lsin(theta)
they give me l = 55 m theta = 12 degrees
x = 55sin(12) = 11.4 m
which is the distance ahead that one sound wave is of the other
sound travels 343 m/s so it travels that distance in
1 s/ 343m (11.4 m) = .033 seconds
so that is how much they need to delay the signal.

is this valid?

Hint -- (don't use the speed of sound...) :-)
 
ok so in that case i would use the given frequency and use dx/l = dsin(theta) = m(lambda) to find the wave length and then use that and the given frequency to find the speed?
is the rest of my method correct? in other words when i find that speed can i use that and the distance x = 11.4 to find the time?
I am having a hard time picturing these optics problems. I am not a very geometric thinker.
 
toothpaste666 said:
ok so in that case i would use the given frequency and use dx/l = dsin(theta) = m(lambda) to find the wave length and then use that and the given frequency to find the speed?
is the rest of my method correct? in other words when i find that speed can i use that and the distance x = 11.4 to find the time?
I am having a hard time picturing these optics problems. I am not a very geometric thinker.

You don't need to find the speed. The incoming radio waves travel not at the speed of sound, but at the speed of ________.

Draw a line from the left telescope to a point on the incoming radio wave line to the right telescope. Make that line perpendicular to both incoming radio wave lines. See how the intersection on the right incoming radio wave line is *above* the telescope by some distance? That's the extra distance that the radio waves have to travel to get to the right antenna, as compared to the left antenna. Traveling that extra distance takes a bit of time, which is found by knowing the distance, and the speed of travel... :-)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: toothpaste666
oh yeah radio waves are electromagnetic waves so they travel at c (the speed of light?
so using
1s/3E8 m (11.4 m) = 3.8E-8 s
 
ah yes i get it now. thank you!
 
:-)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 56 ·
2
Replies
56
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
8K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K