Wave Mechanics help-for optics course

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around wave mechanics in the context of an optics course, specifically focusing on the behavior of a vibrating string and the radiation fields produced by an electrically charged particle attached to it. The mathematical representation of the string's vibration mode is given, and participants are tasked with deriving the electric and magnetic radiation fields in spherical coordinates.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss converting the vibration mode equation into spherical coordinates and the implications of this transformation on the radiation field equations. Questions arise regarding the correct application of derivatives and the nature of unit vectors in spherical coordinates.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring various interpretations of the equations and the relationships between the unit vectors. Some guidance has been provided regarding the use of the product rule in differentiation and the need to express unit vectors in terms of spherical coordinates. However, there is no explicit consensus on the correct approach yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the definitions and roles of unit vectors in the context of the problem, indicating a potential gap in foundational knowledge related to vector calculus and spherical coordinates. Additionally, there is mention of homework constraints that may limit the information available for discussion.

  • #31


Im using the integral table laws of sins/cosines and for the integral of cos^2 I am using the integral of cos^2 = 1/2(x + sinxcosx)...after simplifying everything to what i believe is correct i end up with...

\frac{1}{2} (2\pi + sin(2\pi - \frac{\omega r}{c})cos(2\pi - \frac{\omega r}{c}) - sin(\frac{\omega r}{c})cos(\frac{\omega r}{c}))
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32


Huh?! I've never seen that trig ID before (because it is incorrect). I've seen cos^2(x)=\frac{1}{2}(1-cos(2x) before though. There is an easier way though; the integral of cos^2 over a full period represents the area under cos^2 from 0 to T. Due to symmetry, the area under sin^2 will be the same so

\int_0^T cos^2(\omega(t-r/c))dt=\frac{1}{2} \left(\int_0^T cos^2(\omega(t-r/c))dt +\int_0^T sin^2(\omega(t-r/c))dt \right)

=\frac{1}{2} \int_0^T (cos^2(\omega(t-r/c)) + sin^2(\omega(t-r/c)))dt=\frac{1}{2} \int_0^T (1)dt=\frac{T}{2}

\Rightarrow \left< cos^2(\omega(t-r/c)) \right> _T=\frac{1}{2}

I think you are probably supposed to take a spatial average of P_rad as well, in that case, just integrate the r,theta and phi dependent terms over the volume of a sphere and divide by the volume.
 
  • #33


Thats because its not a trig identity, it was the integral, although i did it incorrectly anyway.

So the power simplified is..

\frac{q^2 \omega^4 z^2_0}{12\pi\epsilon_0 c^3} * sin^2(\frac{2\pi n}{L} rsin\theta cos\phi + a)

There is no mention of a spatial average in the hw, nor in my notes.
 
  • #34


Well, the question asks for the average energy per unit time. To me, that means spatial and temporal average. It makes no sense that the average power would depend on your position in the radiation field.
 
  • #35


I will ask the professor tomorrow what exactly he is looking for. The only thing i have in my notes for average power (that is the same as average energy per unit time right?) is:

power = \frac{q^2}{6\pi\epsilon c^3} *a(t-\frac{r}{c})

Looking over my notes I think we did do the spatial average during the derivation of the above formula...part the derivation consists of what you described on the previous page.

Then he gave us the average power formula

power = \frac{q^2}{6\pi\epsilon c^3} *<a(t-\frac{r}{c})>_T
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K